In the Dark.....
#1 Guest_ssn688_*
Posted 04 January 2003 - 03:56 AM
Having browsed the forums here for a while, I think this is the one For me to start looking for answers.
I've been experimenting with all sorts of gear in the last 12 months and seem to be having sporadic luck. My sub sounds truly great some times, other times I give up and fade it off. One day the front stage seems perfect, the next it feels like all the musos are smoking something unlawful....
I do ALL my own installing, from boxes and pods to the math and research behind it all, so it's a learning experience, but where do most people start? Do they sort the bass first? Or the higher frequencies and the imaging? It would help to hear a good sounding system I spose, all I've ever heard are loud ones. They are cool, but I'm over the crowd pleasing stage.
Anyway enough rambling, If anyone has any advice on where to start tunning and how, I'd welcome sugestions.
[ January 04, 2003, 01:57: Message edited by: ssn688 ]
#2
Posted 04 January 2003 - 04:43 AM
once u got bass, make front stage sound prominant enuff to run with bass evenly... then start fine tuning and making it sound amazing...
basically go
1st) front
2nd) rear
3rd) fine tune front
4th) fine tune rear
5th) sit down, have a cold beer, work for another year or two and then fine tune
That thing u mentioned with it sounding good one day bad the next is something i, and alot of other ppl get, it is often varied by ur mood, even though u dont realise it, the climate can also make a diff, as can driving conditions and the music your playing...
basically its what car audio is, a very unpredictable confine where some conditions are better than others
although as time goes on, and u get more deadening, fine tune the system more, get better (ultimately more expensive) componants and this will even out to a fairly smooth, predictable sound... eventually
#3
Posted 05 January 2003 - 01:50 PM
#4
Posted 06 January 2003 - 02:27 AM
followed by careful tuning: gains, xovers, EQ, time alignment if you have it. and all that can take a looooong time to get right. with plenty of listening time, varied music, and small tweaks here and there. plus i believe you have to be in the 'mood' for tweaking; i find my ears are more receptive to changes if my mind is focused.
are your doors sealed and sound deadened? the tweets angled for improved soundstaging?
is the subbox really solid and secure in the boot?
do you have an EQ? as already asked, what components are you running, and in what car?
#5
Posted 05 January 2003 - 03:02 PM
Deaden for sure, seal, angle mids and tweeters. Then get the best of each component you can afford pretty much. Then tweak your heart out.
Theres no point getting an SQ sub first then thinking about the rest imo
#6 Guest_ssn688_*
Posted 07 January 2003 - 03:14 AM
I have a pioneer deh-4150 h/u with a sony xec-505 xover. Fronts are a pair of pioneer bullit 5.25' splits, the rear is a pair of magnat excentrics. The sub is a 10''response dvc double mag (I think it's made by mbquart) for amps I have a kenwood 848 for the sub (two chans bridged per voice coil) and a pioneer GMH-120 (a 10 year old 4x35 rms). I have installed/constructed the whole setup. VERY heavy(I used to much glass lol) 45 degree angled fibreglass pods up front, with the tweeters on the pillar at about my chin height and lighter glass pods on the back shelf. The sub box is a sealed 40 littre jobie (5 littres above recomended) and made of 18mm mdf with extensive sealant. I have used carpet underlay and 4 cans of bitumen based sound stuff in the boot and under ALL carpet and seats. None in the doors though. Typicaly I run all the splits crossed at about 180 hertz and the sub at 120. I should add here I have only had the sub for a few weeks, I got rid of a 12'' monster that was loud and awfull and got this one. It is PLENTY loud enough.
Oh yeah it's all in a n-13 sss pulsar sedan.
[ January 07, 2003, 01:20: Message edited by: ssn688 ]
#7
Posted 07 January 2003 - 11:19 AM
It is a good and clear piece which is a Must Do for SQ systems. The effect for improving mid bass and general control is very important and will lead you to the best chance to set up good mid-bass to sub-bass integration, crucial for SQ and balance.
Good installation is what SQ is all about and I reckon once you have that done you will be going forward with a good platform.
The basic hardware you have is capable of good results. Good luck with it.
#8 Guest_ssn688_*
Posted 07 January 2003 - 01:15 PM
i'm just putting off doing the doors....
doors are my enemy, i would rather build 2 new sub boxes and balance them on my nose like a dolphin than pull the cards and pods off the doors!!!!!
#9
Posted 07 January 2003 - 01:52 PM
but that comes down to experimenting too which you may already have done to determine what suits your tastes. however, down lower in the kickpanels, angled somewhere towards the opposite-seat headrest, is often a good starting point for improving soundstaging and imaging. i expect your current setup has the R tweet considerably closer to your ears compared to the L when sitting in the driver's seat; this would adversely affect the stereo image, shifting things heavily towards the right.
#10
Posted 07 January 2003 - 04:26 PM
Although it's not as bad as a friend of mine who used to have a set of 5" splits and 2x Orion NT 15s with a MRV-1000 driving each one Or another guy who just had tweeters and subs you'd wanna looooove techno.
#11 Guest_ssn688_*
Posted 07 January 2003 - 04:40 PM
the imaging is hard for me to judge as all I've got to go by is home hifi. As fan of English hifi I can tell the diff between good and bad stereo imaging domestically, but in car is way different. I have tried all sorts of positions for the tweets, but settled on the pillars for these as the dedicated pioneer xovers have 2 positions for the tweeter outputs:Normal, and -3 db. I use the -3db output and find that with the parametric eq in the h/u set on mid=2k hertz, Q=2w, and high=3k hertz Q=2w,,with both the ranges set to -2 out of -5 to +5, there is little harshness and the midrange is crisp and accurate. As for imaging?? I'm big. 6'5 tall and 125 kilo's, so I sit up in the seat, but the wife is 5' nothing and 48 kilo's so she is way down in the seat. When I consider the rear splits are pulling the stage to the back the woman thinks i'm nuts and can't hear the rears at all. I think she gets better front imaging than me, but I get more benifit from the rears than her. I always wondered why ppl didn't think much of rear speakers, when I consider them so important. What I think I need really is someone elses opinion about the way it's set up, and some advice from there. Oh yeah and I need to do the doors.....=(
#12 Guest_ssn688_*
Posted 07 January 2003 - 04:43 PM
[ January 07, 2003, 14:44: Message edited by: ssn688 ]
#13
Posted 07 January 2003 - 11:13 PM
experiment.
#14
Posted 08 January 2003 - 11:29 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













