SQ 2 channel amp
#1
Posted 22 March 2003 - 01:30 AM
im just seeing what options i have for 2 channel amps putting out around ~100W Rms x 2. Price range im looking for ~$500 streetprice.
On my list i had a T420/T320 alpine v12, what else should i be considering that has greater or equal SQ? Could an LRX be bought for that price?
thanks
chris
#2
Posted 22 March 2003 - 01:50 AM
#3
Posted 22 March 2003 - 02:27 AM
#4
Posted 22 March 2003 - 07:00 AM
...do you really need such a powerful amp, coz it will cost $$$ for a really good one.
for $500, you'll get something very good without being audiophile. i would be guided by what quality speakers you're driving. if it's highly premium splits you have (eg: focal utopia, dynaudio, etc, etc), then look at a suitably high quality amp, even if you have to compromise a little on power. but for midprice splits, you will still get the best from them with a very good quality amp.
others to consider:
* coustic 401SE
* cadence Q3000
* DLS classic series CA21
if you want better quality with less rated power (which in reality may not be audibly apparent), you could look at phoenix gold XS/tantrum, DLS reference, hertz, etc.
good luck
#5
Posted 23 March 2003 - 02:13 AM
Rich.
[ March 22, 2003, 12:13: Message edited by: Dr DJ Choss ]
#6
Posted 22 March 2003 - 04:20 PM
BUT, i want to get an amp now that i can use later when i upgrade my splits and not have to buy new splits AND an amp too
when upgrading my splits (in a few months) i was thinking about the $500-$700 range..would that be enough to warrant getting something better than a v12?
#7
Posted 22 March 2003 - 06:03 PM
another option would be a lower range Audison... PG will be out of ur price range unfourtunately
#8
Posted 22 March 2003 - 07:52 PM
the 4*50 bridges to 2*170 and theirs a 2*100 which would do the job nicely. both are less then $500
#9
Posted 22 March 2003 - 10:06 PM
Quote
they'll be running MB Quarts DSD216's..so i know theres no point spending the extra money on getting a really good amp atm
BUT, i want to get an amp now that i can use later when i upgrade my splits
similarly, if you're on a tight budget, then i think you're also better off staying with such an amp to run more expensive splits when you upgrade them. that is, you're probably better off diverting the extra $200~300 for a better amp towards something like sound deadening, custom kicks/pods, or even the splits themselves. you'll get more noticably results from that.
having said that, if you can afford to spend a bit more now, then something like an audison LRx2.250 ( Web Audio Direct $690 + P&H) or a DLS Reference 100 2x50WRMS amp. the better overall quality would be nice for better splits, and their rated power would no doubt not reflect their true performance. and the alpine is a great amp too.
good luck
#10
Posted 22 March 2003 - 10:52 PM
#11
Posted 23 March 2003 - 01:08 AM
A nice Soundstream a couple years old, something like that....
#12
Posted 24 March 2003 - 01:56 AM
Also, if you could get a 4.300 for the same price as a 2.150, which would you get..2.150 has less power in 2 chans obviously, but 4.300 is going to be running each chan @ 2ohms..hmm
#13
Posted 24 March 2003 - 11:57 AM
i personally prefer to run a front stage amp at 4ohm rather than 2ohm, so would go against bridging a 4 channel, despite the added headroom available. pros and cons i guess. but would be worth experimenting to let your own ears decide.
$500 seems very good if in top condition. and i'd take that ahead of an alpine V12.
good luck
#14
Posted 25 March 2003 - 02:15 AM
The question is, is the duel mono going to provide too much power for front stage or will it improve the sound at a tick over 200 rms a side, or am I better off leaving this for the sub and getting a clean smaller amp say coustic.
thanks.
#15
Posted 25 March 2003 - 02:20 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













