JL Audio 500/1 vs Alpine M500
#1
Posted 27 March 2003 - 02:14 AM
what do you guys think of the jl audio 500/1 amp compored to the M500..is it worth the extra $200 difference in price?
the JL will prolly produce more real life power wont it? because of its regulated power supply etc..whereas the alpine will never reach its 14.4V rating?
wat about SQ..is there much difference between these 2 amps?
and if i get a sub to run on the JL is it best to get a 4ohm or dual 4..since the JL will produce the same power to both loads
thanks
#2
Posted 27 March 2003 - 02:24 AM
Cheers,
Joe
#3
Posted 27 March 2003 - 04:17 AM
Quote
Even at idle I get 14.4 on my M500 volt meter... Plus you'll be getting about 630RMS, rated anyways.
the benefit of the JL is its stiffly regulated power supply. which means (theoretically), when you drive the stereo hard, plus add in all the other electrical demands of the car, any fluctuations/drops in voltage won't affect the power output from the amp.
i certainly notice that my voltmeter demonstrates major fluctuations/sags in voltage when i doof hard. it's unavoidable in any system for there's no practical car electrical system capable of maintaining its own stiffly regulated supply to your amps. even large farad caps have limited benefit.
it's not to say the alpine monobloc is not a good thing, and in reality, you don't audibly notice any voltage fluctuations that, presumably, manifest as power output fluctations.
so it would boil down to the differing features as much as anything. and i've heard good performance reports for both amps. critter loves his JL 500/1 which drives his kicker L7 with ease. still, something tells me the JL is a classier amp.
good luck deciding.
#4
Posted 27 March 2003 - 01:15 PM
Very classy amp with immense flexibility, strong power across a variety of loads and voltages, well-made ans quality connections.
Sound is fabulously tight, clean and smooth.
I'm not a big fan of the "get what I got" post, but I know a number of people with these things and they are all very impressed with the product, it is really excellent.
#5
Posted 27 March 2003 - 01:38 PM
Quote
really excellent.
#6
Posted 27 March 2003 - 04:19 PM
but u reckon its worth the extra money??
can a JLW3v2 take the power of the jl500/1? or a type r? or would i be better off getting 2 w3's/type r's etc..
thanks
#7
Posted 27 March 2003 - 04:54 PM
the alpine is no doubt an excellent amp too. i have not compared these side by side, but IMO, i wouldn't expect much if any audible difference.
i view the alpine as being better value.
good luck
#8
Posted 28 March 2003 - 04:07 AM
#9
Posted 28 March 2003 - 05:10 PM
running a jl w3 off it gains at set at 1/4 or just below - anything more than that the sub just goes beserk!
can't comment on the m500 but i would presume it has a few more features (TA apparently?) than the Jl due to it being a newer model.
also i think a bonus of the JL is the regulated power supply. I've got mine in a small car and big bass hits don't aren't putting hte electrical system under a much bigger load than normal.
downside is that its not 1ohm stable - but if you've got a sub thats dvc2+2 then wire it at 4ohms and get the same kinda power!
w3v2 should take the power (its rated at more than the w3) - just go easy on the gains.
my (big) two cents
#10
Posted 28 March 2003 - 05:56 PM
i guess i will be happy with either amp..
with the JL, what would i be better running it at? 4 or 2 ohms? i read the specs..and at 4ohms it has a much greater damping factor..
also, whats the fuse rating on the JL? and also how much current is it likely to actually draw with normal listening..
thanks
#11
Posted 28 March 2003 - 06:07 PM
street price is ~$850-900 too, i'm not sure what the street price is on the alpine.
and yes i also saw the review showing that hte JL put out 700+WRMS into a reactive load,
and 630ish into a static load.
th damping factor is substantial, and in Critter's 500/1 and L7 combo sounds a treat, no risk
#12
Posted 28 March 2003 - 06:52 PM
Quote
and at 4ohms it has a much greater damping factor..
also, whats the fuse rating on the JL? and also how much current is it likely to actually draw with normal listening..
thanks
Therefore: 500 at 4 ohms, 250 at 2 ohms etc (which is plenty so you couldn't tell any difference btw....)
The inline fuse of the JL is actually 50 amps, they are not as efficient as some Class D amps, but heaps more than any Class A/B.
After my Kicker ZR amp where I had significant lights-dimming on big hits, the JL is very electrical-system friendly
#13
Posted 01 April 2003 - 03:41 AM
are you kidding my m300 has a 40 amp fuse
#14 Guest_TIDY_*
Posted 01 April 2003 - 03:50 AM
As for fusing, i contacted a rep from ccs and he reckons a 60 or 70 amp fuse would do the job.
#15
Posted 01 April 2003 - 09:30 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













