Helix RCAs
#1
Posted 31 October 2003 - 12:51 AM
"Shame your installer used twisted pair wire. This stuff is for ballance line transmission. If used like ordinary RCA lead then it acts like a bloody high-gain antenna picking up noise...."
in reference to RF Helix twisted pair RCAs.
#2
Posted 31 October 2003 - 03:43 AM
Or, provided that there's no noise in your system, query them why there's no noise in your system if twisted pair cable makes such a good "antenna"
#3
Posted 31 October 2003 - 10:12 AM
#4
Posted 31 October 2003 - 01:06 PM
#5
Posted 01 November 2003 - 02:16 AM
#6
Posted 31 October 2003 - 05:20 PM
#7
Posted 01 November 2003 - 06:51 PM
#8
Posted 01 November 2003 - 08:05 PM
#9
Posted 03 November 2003 - 01:37 AM
Proof to why twsited rca's are for Balanced outputs only
So yea everyone on here is wrong i guess
[ November 02, 2003, 23:43: Message edited by: Maz ]
#10
Posted 03 November 2003 - 02:30 AM
interesting indeed
#11
Posted 03 November 2003 - 02:41 AM
#12
Posted 03 November 2003 - 02:57 AM
Quote
What that guy said is 100% correct.
Proof to why twsited rca's are for Balanced outputs only
So yea everyone on here is wrong i guess
#13
Posted 03 November 2003 - 04:19 AM
these are just my thought, so if i am wrong and there is most likey a high degree that i am please feel free to correct me.
ben
#14
Posted 03 November 2003 - 04:19 AM
the strength of an emf is directly proportional to the CURRENT carried, not the voltage. the strength also decreases inversely proportionally to distance, ie for every equal distance you move away, the power of the emf is reduced by 1/2
from my point of view, buying 'shielded' rca's is pointless. emf's are extemely difficult to eliminate, and no material can physically block the field, without the field being attracted to it (in the case of rca's, the shielding is on the cable conducting the audio signal, hence the emf is induced into the shielding AND the signal cable)
for further detail read:
http://www.magnetic-shield.com/faq/faq.html
i'm sure a lot of people will like to disagree, but it's a very controverisal topic (it's like saying mobile phones cause cancer [although it has been found that there is no direct link, and the cause is either non-existant or indirect])
anyway, i shall leave you to ponder
alex
#15
Posted 06 November 2003 - 01:50 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













