4" Midrange in doors
#1
Posted 02 March 2004 - 09:55 PM
The 4" mid is not a sealed speaker so would it be better to leave as it currently is or enclose the back of the speaker so it is sealed from the rest of the door?
Will this create unnecesary reflections?
MEA National Sound Quality Champion - Amateur Show 2004
MEA National Sound Quality Champion - Pro Show 2006
Qualified Sound Engineer
#2
Posted 03 March 2004 - 12:42 PM
what's the HP frequency for it?
is it easy to experiment and try it and see? you could also consider adding in dacron or similar to see if that helps if you seal it up behind.
i wouldn't not expect any issues with reflections from behind.
Alfa Romeo 75 (project car): Car Gallery I II III IV
(pending) /////ALPINE . Audible Physics . AudioTechnology . mosconi . morel
Alfa Romeo GT (weekender): Car Gallery I II III | Stereo Stage I II III IV V VI VII
/////ALPINE F1 . morel . DYNAUDIO . \\\IMAGE DYNAMICS/// . OPTIMA . Stinger . Dynamat
MEASQ Runner-Up National Finals 2009 / 2010 / 2011
Alfa Romeo 155 (daily driver): Car Gallery I II III IV V VI | Stereo Stage Ia Ib II III
/////ALPINE F1 . sinfoni . morel . OPTIMA . Stinger . Dynamat
Alfa Romeo 156 (2001-2006): Stereo Stage I II III IV V
CAASQ Pro Show Class - Victorian & National Champion 2005
#3
Posted 04 March 2004 - 06:25 AM
All my other setups has used a sealed midrange so it wasn't an issue. Depending on the frequencies however you may find that such a small driver would prefer a smaller sealed enclosure. It really comes down to trial and error.
As shiny suggested, if it is only performing mid-range duties (unless you have it running down low with an overlap) it's probably not an issue, but I would definately suggest a couple of those Focal deflection pad "thingys", even if just for peace of mind
Are you runing active or passive? Do you have the ability to manipulate the crossover points?
I often found some overlap on crossover points much more effective in producing a smoother transition between drivers. I guess it depends on your slope too though.
I found with SQ, there is a certain amount of theory involved (as with anything mind you), but 9 times out of 10 you will extract the most from your setup by many hours of simple trial and error.

#4
Posted 04 March 2004 - 10:46 AM
I will give it more of a play.
MEA National Sound Quality Champion - Amateur Show 2004
MEA National Sound Quality Champion - Pro Show 2006
Qualified Sound Engineer
#5
Posted 07 March 2004 - 05:50 PM
MEA National Sound Quality Champion - Amateur Show 2004
MEA National Sound Quality Champion - Pro Show 2006
Qualified Sound Engineer
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













