The Latest from the Australian Mobile Electronics Industry Since 1999 60,000+ Readers Per Month! Get the MEA iPhone App

Jump to content


Review of 20 x 12" Subwoofers in a SQ only application.


94 replies to this topic

#1 Marc ♫

    3kW Power House

  • Admin
  • 17,560 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sunbury
  • State:VIC

Posted 24 July 2004 - 07:05 PM

I've just been doing some very thourough searching through our forums, and one thing that is extremely obvious from reading peoples recommendations is that nine times out of 10 their opinions are based purely on what the member has read on the forums, what there mate told them, or just completely unfounded in general.

I'm proposing we should put together the biggest SQ Review yet. I'm suggesting 20 x 12" subwoofers under $800.00 (most common budget for a 12" subwoofer) from various brands.

Now the question I put to you guys is how is the best possible way to conduct this when every subwoofer has a different suggested enclosure, as well as obviously different power handling capabilities and configurations etc.

Is is acceptable to use one enclosure only that is a general volume for all subs being tested? What about power handling differences of woofers? What should be "measured" and what should be audibly "judged"? etc.

I'm just throwing this out there, and if we can come up with a suitable compromise to achieve satisfactory, repeatable results then I am prepared to source 20 woofers from suggested brands and have a crack at this, and involve some CAA members to assist in it.

Posted Image


#2 fuddbutter

    Needs to Harden the f*** up!

  • Members
  • 10,772 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • State:VIC

Posted 24 July 2004 - 07:29 PM

organise the 20 sub's, then get a general census of what size enclosures are reccomended and build 3 different type's

test all subs in the 3 different types
scoring each enclosure

maybe have 3 different Sealed and a few ported just to see how they go in that...
QUOTE (RMA @ Feb 6 2010, 01:22 AM) My only regrets are:
Selling Fudd an amp (for a fraction of the real price) that had been returned by Autobarn Geelong which had been incorrectly used by AB Geelong and turned out to be faulty when Fudd started using it.
Whilst he was given a new amp after it could not be fixed, he never acknowledged any of the assistance given and bitches to this day about it.

www.fuddbutter.com
http://gallery.fuddbutter.com/zen/


MEASQ(CAASQ) Aust Champion 2005
MEASQ(CAASQ) Aust 2nd Place 2006
MEASQ(CAASQ) Vic Champion 2005

MEASQ(CAASQ) Vic Champion 2006


#3 fuddbutter

    Needs to Harden the f*** up!

  • Members
  • 10,772 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • State:VIC

Posted 24 July 2004 - 07:31 PM

and now to make a shortlist of subs :D

Adire audio Brahmah (??)
A/D/S R series ?
Alpine type R
Boston Pro 12.5
Dimond Audio ??
Focal ??
ID v3, IDMAX(??) IDQ
JL 12w3v2
PG ??
Rainbow ???
Soundstreem ???



sofar..... dont know all models cuse i dont know all price's
QUOTE (RMA @ Feb 6 2010, 01:22 AM) My only regrets are:
Selling Fudd an amp (for a fraction of the real price) that had been returned by Autobarn Geelong which had been incorrectly used by AB Geelong and turned out to be faulty when Fudd started using it.
Whilst he was given a new amp after it could not be fixed, he never acknowledged any of the assistance given and bitches to this day about it.

www.fuddbutter.com
http://gallery.fuddbutter.com/zen/


MEASQ(CAASQ) Aust Champion 2005
MEASQ(CAASQ) Aust 2nd Place 2006
MEASQ(CAASQ) Vic Champion 2005

MEASQ(CAASQ) Vic Champion 2006


#4 atmo

    500 - 1500w RMS

  • Members
  • 633 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Geelong
  • Interests:10.5%
  • State:VIC

Posted 24 July 2004 - 07:52 PM

Just a thought....How about throwing in some cheaper models for comparison?

For example, the JL 12W3v2 and the 12W0, DD 3512 and the 2512 and so on. I know it would make judging more difficult as price would inevitably come into the equation, but as a lot of members are on a budget, it would be good to have a comparison so people can decide whether it's worth spending the extra money for the higher end models.

It might make it a bit easier to organise too, as sourcing 20 subs from 20 different manufacturers could be a bit difficult.

2010 Focus XR5 Turbo

Source: Alpine INA-W900E + H100

Fronts: Focal Utopia 165W / Alpine PDX F6

Sub: AlpineType S 12 / Alpine PDX M12


#5 Wrayza

    500 - 1500w RMS

  • Members
  • 639 posts
  • State:VIC

Posted 24 July 2004 - 07:57 PM

How about, going by the manufactures box recommendations but running each sub at the same level.

Maybe this can be done using the driver's sensitivity rating and working out mathematically how much power each sub would need to play at the same level.
Or even play pink noise through each sub and setting that to a certain volume for adequate judging.

I'll be looking forward to this review anyway, good luck on it comming together!

#6 DG Phil

    Hoogste Hond

  • Members
  • 11,943 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • State:QLD

Posted 24 July 2004 - 07:58 PM

You should contact the sub's distributor and inform them of the test parameters (vehicle, power etc) and let them supply their recommended enclosure. You should run two tests, 1. SQ tune, 2. Boomer tune

It's not fair to run all the woofers in the same box.

Phil
Posted Image
RE Audio -- US Amps -- CDT Audio -- Cactus Sounds -- ZED Audio -- Zapco
Builder of the loudest car in Australia 1999-2009
First over 155, 160 and 165dB

#7 gooki

    500 - 1500w RMS

  • Members
  • 1,265 posts

Posted 24 July 2004 - 07:59 PM

I've got a DD2012 I can donate to the cause provided someone pays return shipping etc.

I would propse each sub is tested in manufactures recomended enclosure, testers recomended enclosure and generic sealed enclosure.

#8 fuddbutter

    Needs to Harden the f*** up!

  • Members
  • 10,772 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • State:VIC

Posted 24 July 2004 - 08:13 PM

DD Phil said:

You should run two tests, 1. SQ tune, 2. Boomer tune

topic title said:

Review of 20 x 12" Subwoofers in a SQ only application.

QUOTE (RMA @ Feb 6 2010, 01:22 AM) My only regrets are:
Selling Fudd an amp (for a fraction of the real price) that had been returned by Autobarn Geelong which had been incorrectly used by AB Geelong and turned out to be faulty when Fudd started using it.
Whilst he was given a new amp after it could not be fixed, he never acknowledged any of the assistance given and bitches to this day about it.

www.fuddbutter.com
http://gallery.fuddbutter.com/zen/


MEASQ(CAASQ) Aust Champion 2005
MEASQ(CAASQ) Aust 2nd Place 2006
MEASQ(CAASQ) Vic Champion 2005

MEASQ(CAASQ) Vic Champion 2006


#9 DG Phil

    Hoogste Hond

  • Members
  • 11,943 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • State:QLD

Posted 24 July 2004 - 08:49 PM

Bobby_Digital said:

DD Phil said:

You should run two tests, 1. SQ tune, 2. Boomer tune

topic title said:

Review of 20 x 12" Subwoofers in a SQ only application.

Why not do two tests if you're going to all the effort. It was a suggestion!

Phil
Posted Image
RE Audio -- US Amps -- CDT Audio -- Cactus Sounds -- ZED Audio -- Zapco
Builder of the loudest car in Australia 1999-2009
First over 155, 160 and 165dB

#10 Marc ♫

    3kW Power House

  • Admin
  • 17,560 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sunbury
  • State:VIC

Posted 24 July 2004 - 08:57 PM

Thanks for the offer of donating your sub, but that won't be necessary. We won't have much trouble rounding up 20 subwoofers.

Oh and don't worry Bobby_Digital, I intend on putting a DD or 2 into the equation to prove or disprove some people's percpetions.

Posted Image


#11 mooseBoY

    Team Shonky

  • Members
  • 1,274 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Qld
  • Interests:Car Audio
    Fast cArs
  • State:QLD

Posted 24 July 2004 - 09:27 PM

i would think that building a recomended enclosure for each woofer, whether it be sealed or ported (or both) , would be an exspensive task?

y not use a generic box for all woofers...
i do realise that this may not be fair to some of the woofers and would probably be biast to others....but i would think that there could be some compromise between box design...to generally suit all of the woofers. just my 2 cents.

I think this comparison would be an excellent idea and would help a LOT of CAA members in determining which woofer they should choose in their given application....

#12 roughcactus

    1500 - 3000w RMS

  • Members
  • 1,663 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vic
  • State:VIC

Posted 24 July 2004 - 11:37 PM

Recomended box volumes supplied by the manufactturer are the fairest way to go for all subs...let the importer/distributor supply their recommended box for the sub...or maybe 2 boxes per sub...one sealed and one ported...

I mean seriously if you are considering buying a subwoofer valued at up to $800 or so and you can't be bothered building the right enclosure for it...why did you buy it in the first place???....wank factor?
Don't argue with an idiot...they will bring you down to their level and then beat you with experience

#13 Shieldsy

    Heaps G

  • Members
  • 3,564 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canberra
  • State:ACT

Posted 25 July 2004 - 12:44 AM

Yeh recomended box volume by each company is the only fair way to do this.
maybe as phil said let the distributers decide on the box?
they should kno the product well enough.

Team/WWJD

There gotta be more to life then chasing that every temporary high

2005 - 2nd Aus Finals Street B
2006 - Aus Finals Street B champion

2009 - Comeback time.

Posted Image



#14 HISPL

    I know a bit about a few things ;)

  • Members
  • 5,050 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:WA
  • Interests:Car Audio (Obviously), Golf and Travel
  • State:WA

Posted 25 July 2004 - 01:03 AM

roughcactus said:

Recomended box volumes supplied by the manufactturer are the fairest way to go for all subs...let the importer/distributor supply their recommended box for the sub...or maybe 2 boxes per sub...one sealed and one ported...

I mean seriously if you are considering buying a subwoofer valued at up to $800 or so and you can't be bothered building the right enclosure for it...why did you buy it in the first place???....wank factor?

x2

(Very well said BTW)

#15 RTTZ

    500 - 1500w RMS

  • Members
  • 623 posts

Posted 25 July 2004 - 01:16 AM

HISPL said:

roughcactus said:

Recomended box volumes supplied by the manufactturer are the fairest way to go for all subs...let the importer/distributor supply their recommended box for the sub...or maybe 2 boxes per sub...one sealed and one ported...

I mean seriously if you are considering buying a subwoofer valued at up to $800 or so and you can't be bothered building the right enclosure for it...why did you buy it in the first place???....wank factor?

x2

(Very well said BTW)

X3 :)

And as far as the amp to power them, I think 500watts would be a good amount of power for a sub in a SQ application.

Bye,
Mo





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users