Review of 20 x 12" Subwoofers in a SQ only application.
#1
Posted 24 July 2004 - 07:05 PM
I'm proposing we should put together the biggest SQ Review yet. I'm suggesting 20 x 12" subwoofers under $800.00 (most common budget for a 12" subwoofer) from various brands.
Now the question I put to you guys is how is the best possible way to conduct this when every subwoofer has a different suggested enclosure, as well as obviously different power handling capabilities and configurations etc.
Is is acceptable to use one enclosure only that is a general volume for all subs being tested? What about power handling differences of woofers? What should be "measured" and what should be audibly "judged"? etc.
I'm just throwing this out there, and if we can come up with a suitable compromise to achieve satisfactory, repeatable results then I am prepared to source 20 woofers from suggested brands and have a crack at this, and involve some CAA members to assist in it.

#2
Posted 24 July 2004 - 07:29 PM
test all subs in the 3 different types
scoring each enclosure
maybe have 3 different Sealed and a few ported just to see how they go in that...
Selling Fudd an amp (for a fraction of the real price) that had been returned by Autobarn Geelong which had been incorrectly used by AB Geelong and turned out to be faulty when Fudd started using it.
Whilst he was given a new amp after it could not be fixed, he never acknowledged any of the assistance given and bitches to this day about it.
www.fuddbutter.com
http://gallery.fuddbutter.com/zen/
MEASQ(CAASQ) Aust Champion 2005
MEASQ(CAASQ) Aust 2nd Place 2006
MEASQ(CAASQ) Vic Champion 2005
MEASQ(CAASQ) Vic Champion 2006
#3
Posted 24 July 2004 - 07:31 PM
Adire audio Brahmah (??)
A/D/S R series ?
Alpine type R
Boston Pro 12.5
Dimond Audio ??
Focal ??
ID v3, IDMAX(??) IDQ
JL 12w3v2
PG ??
Rainbow ???
Soundstreem ???
sofar..... dont know all models cuse i dont know all price's
Selling Fudd an amp (for a fraction of the real price) that had been returned by Autobarn Geelong which had been incorrectly used by AB Geelong and turned out to be faulty when Fudd started using it.
Whilst he was given a new amp after it could not be fixed, he never acknowledged any of the assistance given and bitches to this day about it.
www.fuddbutter.com
http://gallery.fuddbutter.com/zen/
MEASQ(CAASQ) Aust Champion 2005
MEASQ(CAASQ) Aust 2nd Place 2006
MEASQ(CAASQ) Vic Champion 2005
MEASQ(CAASQ) Vic Champion 2006
#4
Posted 24 July 2004 - 07:52 PM
For example, the JL 12W3v2 and the 12W0, DD 3512 and the 2512 and so on. I know it would make judging more difficult as price would inevitably come into the equation, but as a lot of members are on a budget, it would be good to have a comparison so people can decide whether it's worth spending the extra money for the higher end models.
It might make it a bit easier to organise too, as sourcing 20 subs from 20 different manufacturers could be a bit difficult.
2010 Focus XR5 Turbo
Source: Alpine INA-W900E + H100
Fronts: Focal Utopia 165W / Alpine PDX F6
Sub: AlpineType S 12 / Alpine PDX M12
#5
Posted 24 July 2004 - 07:57 PM
Maybe this can be done using the driver's sensitivity rating and working out mathematically how much power each sub would need to play at the same level.
Or even play pink noise through each sub and setting that to a certain volume for adequate judging.
I'll be looking forward to this review anyway, good luck on it comming together!
#6
Posted 24 July 2004 - 07:58 PM
It's not fair to run all the woofers in the same box.
Phil

RE Audio -- US Amps -- CDT Audio -- Cactus Sounds -- ZED Audio -- Zapco
Builder of the loudest car in Australia 1999-2009
First over 155, 160 and 165dB
#7
Posted 24 July 2004 - 07:59 PM
I would propse each sub is tested in manufactures recomended enclosure, testers recomended enclosure and generic sealed enclosure.
#8
Posted 24 July 2004 - 08:13 PM
DD Phil said:
topic title said:
Selling Fudd an amp (for a fraction of the real price) that had been returned by Autobarn Geelong which had been incorrectly used by AB Geelong and turned out to be faulty when Fudd started using it.
Whilst he was given a new amp after it could not be fixed, he never acknowledged any of the assistance given and bitches to this day about it.
www.fuddbutter.com
http://gallery.fuddbutter.com/zen/
MEASQ(CAASQ) Aust Champion 2005
MEASQ(CAASQ) Aust 2nd Place 2006
MEASQ(CAASQ) Vic Champion 2005
MEASQ(CAASQ) Vic Champion 2006
#9
Posted 24 July 2004 - 08:49 PM
Bobby_Digital said:
DD Phil said:
topic title said:
Why not do two tests if you're going to all the effort. It was a suggestion!
Phil

RE Audio -- US Amps -- CDT Audio -- Cactus Sounds -- ZED Audio -- Zapco
Builder of the loudest car in Australia 1999-2009
First over 155, 160 and 165dB
#10
Posted 24 July 2004 - 08:57 PM
Oh and don't worry Bobby_Digital, I intend on putting a DD or 2 into the equation to prove or disprove some people's percpetions.

#11
Posted 24 July 2004 - 09:27 PM
y not use a generic box for all woofers...
i do realise that this may not be fair to some of the woofers and would probably be biast to others....but i would think that there could be some compromise between box design...to generally suit all of the woofers. just my 2 cents.
I think this comparison would be an excellent idea and would help a LOT of CAA members in determining which woofer they should choose in their given application....
#12
Posted 24 July 2004 - 11:37 PM
I mean seriously if you are considering buying a subwoofer valued at up to $800 or so and you can't be bothered building the right enclosure for it...why did you buy it in the first place???....wank factor?
#13
Posted 25 July 2004 - 12:44 AM
maybe as phil said let the distributers decide on the box?
they should kno the product well enough.
Team/WWJD
There gotta be more to life then chasing that every temporary high
2005 - 2nd Aus Finals Street B
2006 - Aus Finals Street B champion
2009 - Comeback time.

#14
Posted 25 July 2004 - 01:03 AM
roughcactus said:
I mean seriously if you are considering buying a subwoofer valued at up to $800 or so and you can't be bothered building the right enclosure for it...why did you buy it in the first place???....wank factor?
x2
(Very well said BTW)
#15
Posted 25 July 2004 - 01:16 AM
HISPL said:
roughcactus said:
I mean seriously if you are considering buying a subwoofer valued at up to $800 or so and you can't be bothered building the right enclosure for it...why did you buy it in the first place???....wank factor?
x2
(Very well said BTW)
X3
And as far as the amp to power them, I think 500watts would be a good amount of power for a sub in a SQ application.
Bye,
Mo
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













