Chart - Frequency Spectrum & Instruments
#16
Posted 22 January 2006 - 09:13 AM
#17
Posted 22 January 2006 - 09:55 AM
depends on how you do the test, how you measure the results and how you interpret the measurements.
http://www.aes.org
MEASQ 2008 National Judges' Choice
MEASQ 2009 Victorian Runner Up - Expert Class, National Champion - Expert Class
dB Drag 2008 Street A: 147.2dB @ 46Hz
VK3TUG - Life's too short to QRP
~Spyne~, on 15 July 2009 - 07:33 PM, said:
TEAM Floor-Pods
#18
Posted 21 March 2006 - 01:50 PM
#19
Posted 23 March 2006 - 08:39 PM
One year some guys did a bunch of listening tests with random people, to determine how high a frequency people were able to hear the difference between a sine wave and a sawtooth wave. Turned out people could pick them apart at 15kHz.
The point was that sine waves and sawtooth waves should be identical up to the first harmonic - which is double the root frequency. In other words, according to theory at least, people were hearing things at 30kHz (and they were neither small children, nor dogs).
I've thought about this a lot over the years, and really wish i knew more about their methodology, because it's a pretty damned interesting result ;-)
Edited by xen, 23 March 2006 - 08:40 PM.
#20
Posted 27 May 2006 - 03:49 PM
xen, on Mar 23 2006, 08:39 PM, said:
One year some guys did a bunch of listening tests with random people, to determine how high a frequency people were able to hear the difference between a sine wave and a sawtooth wave. Turned out people could pick them apart at 15kHz.
The point was that sine waves and sawtooth waves should be identical up to the first harmonic - which is double the root frequency. In other words, according to theory at least, people were hearing things at 30kHz (and they were neither small children, nor dogs).
I've thought about this a lot over the years, and really wish i knew more about their methodology, because it's a pretty damned interesting result ;-)
Play a square wave at 20khz and many more will notice something due to the harmonics. Even if they can't hear the fundamental certain individuals will sense something even if they don't perceive it as sound. It may simply make some of them feel uncomfortable or agitated without even knowing why.
I can hear 80khz! Well to be more to the point I heard the effect 80khz switchmode noise had on frequencies in the audible range... BAD!!
Intermodulate two frequencies and you don't just get the combination of those two frequencies alone... new frequency by-products can result.
Even frequencies well outside of the range of human hearing can have audible results when combined with those within the audible range. This can be both good and bad. Harmonics that cannot be heard in isolation intermodulate with, and add characteristics to those sounds we can hear. Wide bandwith audio systems (SACD etc) potentially provide a greater degree of fidelity (with suitable wide bandwith recordings). However poor shielding, filtering, power supply rejection and common mode rejection can cause unwanted ('out of audible range') noise to enter and have a corresponding negative effect on the sound we can hear.
Would you feel completely comfortable starting a recording project using totally unbalanced equipment (even mic lines) even if you couldn't hear any audible noise with the monitoring cranked right up?
I know I wouldn't!
Edited by pundit, 29 May 2006 - 09:34 PM.
#21
Posted 02 December 2006 - 09:50 AM
or is it really just dependant on my car ?
#22
Posted 02 December 2006 - 10:21 AM
you need to try each setting and see how it changes the sound, then leave it where you like it best.
http://www.aes.org
MEASQ 2008 National Judges' Choice
MEASQ 2009 Victorian Runner Up - Expert Class, National Champion - Expert Class
dB Drag 2008 Street A: 147.2dB @ 46Hz
VK3TUG - Life's too short to QRP
~Spyne~, on 15 July 2009 - 07:33 PM, said:
TEAM Floor-Pods
#23
Posted 19 August 2008 - 08:30 AM
http://www.digital-r...udio_test_p.cgi
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













