The Latest from the Australian Mobile Electronics Industry Since 1999 60,000+ Readers Per Month! Get the MEA iPhone App

Jump to content


JL Audio 8W7 & SQ


72 replies to this topic

#31 ~thematt~

    If I think its funny, it is. If you dont, you're stupid

  • Members
  • 3,306 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:WA
  • State:WA

Posted 12 November 2009 - 09:38 AM

muzzy66, on Nov 10 2009, 08:54 AM, said:

- every other one tested performed mediocre including Velodyne.
You've got your woofers mixed up. Velodyne is a manufacturer, and the 'Velodyne' that is so well talked up is called a Direct Drive unit (or DD models). These have accelerometers built into them that allows the woofer to correct its movements almost instantaneously. They are, by design, more accurate and have lower distortion then comparable conventional units.

The unit in the test is an SPL style unit, not a direct drive. Apples and Oranges.

data_mine, on Nov 12 2009, 06:37 AM, said:

In a car environment I'd say the sub box makes more of a difference.

As for trusting the numbers, you either have to measure everything yourself, or trust the manufactuers all do their testing the same way so the numbers are actually comparable.

In that case, I suggest, unless you review/measure yourself you can't trust what you're being told, third party review, or manufacturers specs.
Br85 is right. Environment is the big factor. The subbox is waayyy more important then the sub itself, but its the relationship/interaction between the alignment and the environment that produces the final result.

Here is a question for everyone who says you 'cant use manufacturers specs'. What EXACTLY are you referring to? Which specs specifically, do you think are incorrect in the car? T/S specs? Distortion, FR plots?

Posted Image


Its all about the music. Always has been, always will be. Im here for the music.

#32 data_mine

    1500 - 3000w RMS

  • Members
  • 1,698 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canberra
  • State:ACT

Posted 12 November 2009 - 09:45 AM

~thematt~, on Nov 12 2009, 10:38 AM, said:

Here is a question for everyone who says you 'cant use manufacturers specs'. What EXACTLY are you referring to? Which specs specifically, do you think are incorrect in the car? T/S specs? Distortion, FR plots?

My assumption there, was BR85 talking about FR plots.

Frequency Response, as we already know is affected, by the enclosure and environment greatly. So unless everyone tests using the same enclosure and environment the FR graphs are not comparable. (Is there a ISO standard for this? Is this what Klippel is supposed to solve?)

t/s specs should be fairly accurate only differing due to manufacturing tolerances. Since I got my WT3 t/s spec measurement device, I've tested the various speakers and subs I own, the results are within a bees d*** of published specs. I do use 'better' brands though. I guess some BOSS audio stuff may be further out of tolerance, having said that my Cadence sub measured with 1% of spec.

Edited by data_mine, 12 November 2009 - 09:47 AM.


#33 Matt VIP

    Got loud yet?.....nope...

  • Members
  • 4,090 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Coburg is real.
  • State:ACT

Posted 12 November 2009 - 10:11 AM

your cadence sub has also recently been nominated for UN secretary general.

Needs a big box though...
Posted Image

Those interested in ACT events click here!


Quote

The only excuse for passive crossovers is their low cost. Their behavior changes with the signal level dependent dynamics of the drivers. They block the power amplifier from taking maximum control over the voice coil motion. They are a waste of time, if accuracy of reproduction is the goal.

~Spyne~, on 18 December 2009 - 09:05 AM, said:

my vibe tastes like hedgehog slice

#34 data_mine

    1500 - 3000w RMS

  • Members
  • 1,698 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canberra
  • State:ACT

Posted 12 November 2009 - 10:16 AM

Matt VIP, on Nov 12 2009, 11:11 AM, said:

your cadence sub has also recently been nominated for UN secretary general.

Needs a big box though...

You've always been jealous of it, I'll swap you it for your JL amps.

Thenyou can have some non-muddy bass (and you've got a big enough boot for it), and I can have some nice new amps. Everyone's a winner.

#35 Gobbledok

    Denny Crane

  • Verified Trader
  • 1,343 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Newmarket
  • State:VIC

Posted 14 November 2009 - 03:25 PM

out of curiosity, what cadence sub is it? i was actually having an argument with a mate about how accurate t/s specs are when published. (by cheaper brands)

2008 Corolla - IDA-X100 - 2x Cadence DCA2500 - 4x Cadence DCW15 - 3 Optima D34M - PB-149.1 - DECEASED

2006 Vito "The Don" - IVA-W205 - 3x Cadence ZRS-9 - 6 Cadence DCW15 - 5 Fullriver SPV70 - PB-148.3 @ 25Hz - DECEASED

1999 Merc C180 - CDA-9887 - AudioSystem F6-380 - Alpine Type X Pro Tweets - Infinity Kappa Perfect 6" Mids - Alpine MRD-M605 - Alpine SBR-S123V - Fullriver SPV70 - FOR SALE w/o stereo.


Spoiler

#36 data_mine

    1500 - 3000w RMS

  • Members
  • 1,698 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canberra
  • State:ACT

Posted 14 November 2009 - 10:07 PM

GTi-FTW, on Nov 14 2009, 04:25 PM, said:

out of curiosity, what cadence sub is it? i was actually having an argument with a mate about how accurate t/s specs are when published. (by cheaper brands)

An ancient (must be near on 10 years old now), UD-104 10" 4ohm SVC

#37 ~thematt~

    If I think its funny, it is. If you dont, you're stupid

  • Members
  • 3,306 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:WA
  • State:WA

Posted 14 November 2009 - 11:03 PM

data_mine, on Nov 12 2009, 07:45 AM, said:

My assumption there, was BR85 talking about FR plots.

Frequency Response, as we already know is affected, by the enclosure and environment greatly. So unless everyone tests using the same enclosure and environment the FR graphs are not comparable. (Is there a ISO standard for this? Is this what Klippel is supposed to solve?)

t/s specs should be fairly accurate only differing due to manufacturing tolerances. Since I got my WT3 t/s spec measurement device, I've tested the various speakers and subs I own, the results are within a bees d*** of published specs. I do use 'better' brands though. I guess some BOSS audio stuff may be further out of tolerance, having said that my Cadence sub measured with 1% of spec.
The only point of t/s specs are to create an enclosure. They are worthless otherwise. That being said, you dont need them to get a good/great enclosure. It just gets you there with less iterations.

The Klippel doesnt test FR. It allows you to test the real parts of a motor system that impact audible response. Things like BL curves, Mechanical Compliance, Suspension Stiffness, inductance and symmetry are all incredibly important. This is the type of data that the Klippel pumps out.

Frequency Response is very useful, if you use it properly. The problem has never been with the specs, but the knobs that read them. Looking at a graph and going 'geez, that bump at 2k dont look too good, I dont like this speaker' is just downright foolish.

Posted Image


Its all about the music. Always has been, always will be. Im here for the music.

#38 Fury♫

  • Moderators
  • 4,422 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Melbourne
  • State:VIC

Posted 14 November 2009 - 11:38 PM

Polar measurements and power response is far more useful then your "standard" frequency response graph.

Anywho we're digressing from the topic at hand a wee bit.

#39 Riley.

    The Sub bass Guy

  • Members
  • 2,814 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brisbane
  • State:QLD

Posted 15 November 2009 - 04:32 PM

fury, on Nov 14 2009, 11:38 PM, said:

Anywho we're digressing from the topic at hand a wee bit.

and you are surprised? this may as well be the Off Topic section some times....although every question goes the same way

- question
- one slightly related theory
- a different theory arguing
- a distributor comes in and says "hey everyone buy my product"
- more arguing
- someone posts up a whole heap of graphs/specs
- more arguing going further off topic
- someone goes "oh hey this is a bit off topic"
- question isnt really any closer to being answered
No car, no system, no idea

#40 fuddbutter

    Needs to Harden the f*** up!

  • Members
  • 10,773 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • State:VIC

Posted 15 November 2009 - 06:16 PM

- Someone sum's up the thread in a witty point form
QUOTE (RMA @ Feb 6 2010, 01:22 AM) My only regrets are:
Selling Fudd an amp (for a fraction of the real price) that had been returned by Autobarn Geelong which had been incorrectly used by AB Geelong and turned out to be faulty when Fudd started using it.
Whilst he was given a new amp after it could not be fixed, he never acknowledged any of the assistance given and bitches to this day about it.

www.fuddbutter.com
http://gallery.fuddbutter.com/zen/


MEASQ(CAASQ) Aust Champion 2005
MEASQ(CAASQ) Aust 2nd Place 2006
MEASQ(CAASQ) Vic Champion 2005

MEASQ(CAASQ) Vic Champion 2006


#41 Green_machine

    25 - 250w RMS

  • Members
  • 140 posts
  • State:QLD

Posted 15 November 2009 - 08:01 PM

there's no best sub on the market, every one has the own opioin on subs. Mybe just youtube a few 8" subs and see which one you like
2009 "quote" of the year winner

#42 broadz

    ♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫

  • Members
  • 2,396 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Morwell Vic
  • State:VIC

Posted 15 November 2009 - 08:11 PM

as youtube is OBVIOUSLY the best way of choosing speakers/subs... wtf?

I think i have narrowed the best 2 eight inch subs to the Focal Be 8 and the JL 8W7 (which i ended up buying). however i think it is too much of a compromise in output over the dual twelves I'm upgrading from.

Edited by broadz, 15 November 2009 - 08:12 PM.

Posted Image


#43 ~thematt~

    If I think its funny, it is. If you dont, you're stupid

  • Members
  • 3,306 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:WA
  • State:WA

Posted 15 November 2009 - 09:47 PM

3seven7, on Nov 15 2009, 06:01 PM, said:

Mybe just youtube a few 8" subs and see which one you like
Oh my god. I'm laughing so loud its making me cry!!!

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Posted Image


Its all about the music. Always has been, always will be. Im here for the music.

#44 broadz

    ♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫♫

  • Members
  • 2,396 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Morwell Vic
  • State:VIC

Posted 16 November 2009 - 07:18 AM

do we have quote of the year?

Posted Image


#45 Gobbledok

    Denny Crane

  • Verified Trader
  • 1,343 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Newmarket
  • State:VIC

Posted 16 November 2009 - 07:57 AM

broadz, on Nov 16 2009, 08:18 AM, said:

do we have quote of the year?

i would certainly hope so!

2008 Corolla - IDA-X100 - 2x Cadence DCA2500 - 4x Cadence DCW15 - 3 Optima D34M - PB-149.1 - DECEASED

2006 Vito "The Don" - IVA-W205 - 3x Cadence ZRS-9 - 6 Cadence DCW15 - 5 Fullriver SPV70 - PB-148.3 @ 25Hz - DECEASED

1999 Merc C180 - CDA-9887 - AudioSystem F6-380 - Alpine Type X Pro Tweets - Infinity Kappa Perfect 6" Mids - Alpine MRD-M605 - Alpine SBR-S123V - Fullriver SPV70 - FOR SALE w/o stereo.


Spoiler





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users