Choice of Amp to drive the following SQ Build
#1
Posted 30 November 2009 - 10:35 PM
Im a long time lurker/reader very rare poster.
Im currently trying to decide what amps are going to be best suited to drive my Esotec 242's & 342's, Now im currently looking at ARC audio or Tru Technology and Genesis.
Im going to be running 2 x idq10 v3's in the boot. So im sure a monoblock will be able to handle that job quiet well.
Any input would be great.
Cheers
Dan
#2
Posted 30 November 2009 - 11:07 PM
Then as a secondary, also think about physical size and weight. Something that is forgotten sometimes, with current slim amps being very good.
syd-monster
#3
Posted 01 December 2009 - 06:14 AM
I've had mine for over a year and no complaints whatsoever. Definitely worth looking at.
Cheers,
shaky
Car: Nup!!
System: Lotsa gear in lotsa boxes!!
#4
Posted 01 December 2009 - 06:57 AM
syd-monster, on Nov 30 2009, 11:07 PM, said:
Then as a secondary, also think about physical size and weight. Something that is forgotten sometimes, with current slim amps being very good.
I was looking at the slimline genesis amps, i do think they are rather cool the fact they are so tiny yet pack a punch! Plus my old man has one and ive been fan of it!
shaky, on Dec 1 2009, 06:14 AM, said:
I've had mine for over a year and no complaints whatsoever. Definitely worth looking at.
Cheers,
shaky
I also like the TRU Billets as well!
Price vs Quality out of those two, what would be the better choice. Im tending to sway towards the Genesis tbh.
Cheers
Dan
#5
Posted 01 December 2009 - 12:21 PM
http://www.aes.org
MEASQ 2008 National Judges' Choice
MEASQ 2009 Victorian Runner Up - Expert Class, National Champion - Expert Class
dB Drag 2008 Street A: 147.2dB @ 46Hz
VK3TUG - Life's too short to QRP
~Spyne~, on 15 July 2009 - 07:33 PM, said:
TEAM Floor-Pods
#6
Posted 01 December 2009 - 09:53 PM
if I was to go with the genesis amps, what profile amps would be best suited. ( yea im pretty nub with this if you cant tell )
Cheers
#7
Posted 02 December 2009 - 07:37 AM
you have a set of 242 (rear?) and 342 (front?), that right?
i'd run more power into the 342's up front (4ch bridged maybe) and a nice 2ch for the 242's..
and a matching mono to run your IDQ10's..

Damo - The MEAVIC Photographer
My ride : 2001 VX Lumina wagon - [CRUZN.5]
Signal & Control by: /////Alpine
Music & Mayhem by: Morel & Image Dynamics
Power by: Phoenix Gold
Thanks to : Phatt Audio Concepts : Sew Fine Interiors : Coinslot Enterprises
#8
Posted 02 December 2009 - 09:38 PM
How about a pair of Helix A1's? The A1 is a full range, partial Class A monoblock which are good for 1 x 240w @ 12V for each amp.
An individual monoblock for L and R channel - can't get better channel seperation then that!!
They should be around $1,200 apiece give or take.
Even an A2 (2x150) would probably suffice
Source: Clarion HX-D2
Tweeter: Scan-Speak D3004/6020-00
Midbass: Scan-Speak 18W/8535-00
Speaker Amp: Tru-Technology Billet B-475
Subwoofer: Peerless 830877 XXLS 12"
Subwoofer Amp: Celestra VA210
1998 Ford EL Fairmont
Source: Eclipse CD8455
Tweeter: Scan-Speak D3004/6020-00
Midbass: Peerless 831882 HDS Exclusive
Subwoofer: Peerless 830846 XXLS 10"
Amp: Helix HXA-500
#9
Posted 02 December 2009 - 09:57 PM
Profile 4 Ultra for the fronts this should give you,
2 x 300rms bridged for the front,
A Profile 2 or Profile 4 for the rears,
So either
2 x 75rms
or
2 x 140rms
And a Profile 1 Ultra for the subs,
What impedence spec are your subs?
[SIZE=1]
HU Eclipse CD7000
F DLS UR36's
F Midbass Morel HCW8's
Subbass JBL W15Gti
Powered by ZED Leviathan
Car audio is all about compromise. There's no single best way to do anything. Optimization in the face of several variables ... often conflicting ... means compromise. The educated are better positioned to sort through the compromises than the opinionated. Werewolf/Lycan 28-11-2006
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













