The Latest from the Australian Mobile Electronics Industry Since 1999 60,000+ Readers Per Month! Get the MEA iPhone App

Jump to content


Name the MEA ACT 2010 Series Poll!


3 replies to this topic

Poll: Vote for your favourite name and win! (16 member(s) have cast votes)

What should the 2010 MEA ACT Series name be?

  1. 2010 Beat 'em with Beats series (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  2. 2010 Street Beats and Sweet Sound series (2 votes [12.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 12.50%

  3. 2010 Good Vibrations series (7 votes [43.75%])

    Percentage of vote: 43.75%

  4. 2010 LOUD N PROUD series (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  5. 2010 Gods of Sound series (1 votes [6.25%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.25%

  6. 2010 Loud and Proud series (2 votes [12.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 12.50%

  7. 2010 Beats and Bass Series (4 votes [25.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 25.00%

Vote

#1 Matt VIP

    Got loud yet?.....nope...

  • Members
  • 4,090 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Coburg is real.
  • State:ACT

Posted 11 January 2010 - 11:11 AM

Hi guys

As per the previous thread, its now time to hit the phones and vote for your favourite series name!

:violin:

Edited by Matt VIP, 11 January 2010 - 11:15 AM.

Posted Image

Those interested in ACT events click here!


Quote

The only excuse for passive crossovers is their low cost. Their behavior changes with the signal level dependent dynamics of the drivers. They block the power amplifier from taking maximum control over the voice coil motion. They are a waste of time, if accuracy of reproduction is the goal.

~Spyne~, on 18 December 2009 - 09:05 AM, said:

my vibe tastes like hedgehog slice

#2 Matt VIP

    Got loud yet?.....nope...

  • Members
  • 4,090 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Coburg is real.
  • State:ACT

Posted 12 January 2010 - 04:12 PM

voting closes at 6pm!!!!
Posted Image

Those interested in ACT events click here!


Quote

The only excuse for passive crossovers is their low cost. Their behavior changes with the signal level dependent dynamics of the drivers. They block the power amplifier from taking maximum control over the voice coil motion. They are a waste of time, if accuracy of reproduction is the goal.

~Spyne~, on 18 December 2009 - 09:05 AM, said:

my vibe tastes like hedgehog slice

#3 Westy87

    500 - 1500w RMS

  • Members
  • 768 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:RAAF Richmond, NSW
  • State:NSW

Posted 12 January 2010 - 04:15 PM

You know what is funny? My mum suggested I try the Good Vibrations series, then when I went to write it in some 1 beat me to it by about an hour!
Car:
|MY07 Subaru Liberty Wagon, 2.5i Sports-Auto, Pearl White|

Car Audio:
|Sub+Box: 2 X Treo Engineering SSi 10.44's-Custom F/Glass ported Qtr-Panel enclosures|
|Sub Amp: Hertz HP1KD|
|H/U: Alpine IVA-W502EV|
|Front Stage: Boston SL60 Splits Bi-Amped|
|Front Stage Amps: 2 X Treo Engineering 75.4's|
|Processing: Alpine PXA-H701|
|Power Supply: Optima D34 Yellow Top|
|Future Plans: 3-Way fronts|

#4 Matt VIP

    Got loud yet?.....nope...

  • Members
  • 4,090 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Coburg is real.
  • State:ACT

Posted 12 January 2010 - 09:21 PM

well folks, the winner is, of course

THE MEA ACT 2010 GOOD VIBRATIONS SERIES!

:yahoo:

GANGRZ, on Dec 19 2009, 03:00 AM, said:

MEA ACT 2010 GOOD VIBRATIONS series

yeah im bored n tired lol. :P

Nice one Ado, Beach Boys and theramin music coming to an SQ comp near you!

PM me your details and I'll sort out the prize

:good:


thanks troops!!!!

sorry Westy! Missed it by that much...

Posted Image
Posted Image

Those interested in ACT events click here!


Quote

The only excuse for passive crossovers is their low cost. Their behavior changes with the signal level dependent dynamics of the drivers. They block the power amplifier from taking maximum control over the voice coil motion. They are a waste of time, if accuracy of reproduction is the goal.

~Spyne~, on 18 December 2009 - 09:05 AM, said:

my vibe tastes like hedgehog slice





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users