Power for Dynaudio 242GT
#1
Posted 11 February 2010 - 01:52 AM
Having a loot at the Dyn website it says that the System 242 GT has a continuous power handling of 100WRMS.
I thought "Sweet" because my Focal FP2.150 will push out 150WRMS.
I rang the local dealer of Dynaudio to get some prices and when he found out what my amp was, he said "Oh" that it would not have enough power and usually they push up to 1k per side into them and pretty much said that you would not want less and 400-500WRMS..
Now.. I am no noob to car audio.. I know that head room is good - I used to push 150WRMS into my Focal Polyglass splits and they sang beautifully. But... To say that you need this sort of power for a speaker that is rated at 100WRMS, does not sit right.. Yes, I would like to push about 200-250, alas, I cannot with these amps..
What are your thoughts?
Or would I be better off running KRX2's which are 2ohm and get 200WRMS out of my amp? Personally I am not sure if the increased THD for 2ohm is worth the extra 50WRMS..
#2
Posted 11 February 2010 - 06:30 AM
sure alot of people seem to think that dynaudios only really come 'alive' once u start pushing ~300wrms into each side, but i say bollocks.


#3
Posted 11 February 2010 - 08:09 AM
#4
Posted 11 February 2010 - 01:14 PM
i've had 300wrms a side into my 242's full passive, and 2x300wrms (@4ohm) + 2x ~200wrms (@6ohm) into them active..
run the dyn's off the current amp.. if you feel it needs more (and you can afford it), add another amp later..

Damo - The MEAVIC Photographer
My ride : 2001 VX Lumina wagon - [CRUZN.5]
Signal & Control by: /////Alpine
Music & Mayhem by: Morel & Image Dynamics
Power by: Phoenix Gold
Thanks to : Phatt Audio Concepts : Sew Fine Interiors : Frankson Car Audio
#5
Posted 11 February 2010 - 06:37 PM
http://www.aes.org
MEASQ 2008 National Judges' Choice
MEASQ 2009 Victorian Runner Up - Expert Class, National Champion - Expert Class
dB Drag 2008 Street A: 147.2dB @ 46Hz
VK3TUG - Life's too short to QRP
~Spyne~, on 15 July 2009 - 07:33 PM, said:
TEAM Floor-Pods
#6
Posted 11 February 2010 - 08:10 PM
#7
Posted 14 February 2010 - 11:30 AM
which single amp would do that?
only things that could do that would be bridged 4 channel amps and even then it would be a stretch.
short list that might come close:
RF Power T15004
The Audiosystems Mosconi AS 200.4
#8
Posted 14 February 2010 - 12:01 PM
blue_6006, on Feb 11 2010, 02:52 AM, said:
Can I ask who the dealer was?
400rms is warranty voiding power and if not setup correctly, could damage the speakers.
As above, The amp you have will be fine. Dyn's are pretty power hungry but they will still sound great with your amp.

#9
Posted 15 February 2010 - 03:28 AM
jas, on Feb 14 2010, 09:30 AM, said:
which single amp would do that?
only things that could do that would be bridged 4 channel amps and even then it would be a stretch.
short list that might come close:
RF Power T15004
The Audiosystems Mosconi AS 200.4
I think he meant total power in an active setup.. Still in an active setup, 150WRMS would be even better because less is wasted in the passive XO.. So either way the logic is flawed.
ReMiX, on Feb 14 2010, 10:01 AM, said:
400rms is warranty voiding power and if not setup correctly, could damage the speakers.
As above, The amp you have will be fine. Dyn's are pretty power hungry but they will still sound great with your amp.
Hey mate, I do not want to flame anyone directly on the forums.. But lets just say there are few Dyn dealers in Perth.
#10
Posted 16 February 2010 - 01:19 AM
ReMiX, on Feb 14 2010, 03:01 AM, said:
400rms is warranty voiding power and if not setup correctly, could damage the speakers.
As above, The amp you have will be fine. Dyn's are pretty power hungry but they will still sound great with your amp.
The dealer was me
There are a number of our customers that use large power amps (multiple 2ch amps) to run Dynaudio speakers.
One in particular uses two Treo 2ch amps that are rated at producing 1000wrms bridged into 4ohm, one per side. There is an Alpine PDX 1.1000 running the Oz Audio woofer and the system sounds really good
The only speaker failure that I can remember is an Esotar midbass that was running active from the bridged channels from an Arc Audio KAR series 4ch which is in Pete's car.
The midbass has been replaced and has been running fine ever since, it was only getting about 250-300wrms IIRC
I feel that Dyns come alive with >300wrms running them per side, as for voiding warranty there hasn't been a Dyn failure other than the one that I mentioned that I am aware of.
150wrms would be the bare minimum I would suggest running them with.
Edited by HISPL, 16 February 2010 - 01:20 AM.
#11
Posted 16 February 2010 - 02:17 AM
HISPL, on Feb 15 2010, 11:19 PM, said:
There are a number of our customers that use large power amps (multiple 2ch amps) to run Dynaudio speakers.
One in particular uses two Treo 2ch amps that are rated at producing 1000wrms bridged into 4ohm, one per side. There is an Alpine PDX 1.1000 running the Oz Audio woofer and the system sounds really good
The only speaker failure that I can remember is an Esotar midbass that was running active from the bridged channels from an Arc Audio KAR series 4ch which is in Pete's car.
The midbass has been replaced and has been running fine ever since, it was only getting about 250-300wrms IIRC
I feel that Dyns come alive with >300wrms running them per side, as for voiding warranty there hasn't been a Dyn failure other than the one that I mentioned that I am aware of.
150wrms would be the bare minimum I would suggest running them with.
AHA! LOL..
Yeah, if you have the luxury of power - why not use it? As I said, I was pushing 150WRMS from a Sony XES M3 into my Polyglass mid's and 60WRMS from a XES M1 into my tweeters and it was amazing - so yeah power is always good.
If everyone turned around and said do not bother trying to power them with that amp, then I would not buy the speakers or get a better amp if I wanted them that badly so was just checking for user experience.
Anyways, I will try and pop down to have a listen to them on the weekend.
#12
Posted 16 February 2010 - 07:19 AM
HISPL, on Feb 16 2010, 02:19 AM, said:
150wrms would be the bare minimum I would suggest running them with.
ran active with 4x 300wrms @4ohm (4ch bridged per side) and they really sung...
Its all about gain control i'd say....

Damo - The MEAVIC Photographer
My ride : 2001 VX Lumina wagon - [CRUZN.5]
Signal & Control by: /////Alpine
Music & Mayhem by: Morel & Image Dynamics
Power by: Phoenix Gold
Thanks to : Phatt Audio Concepts : Sew Fine Interiors : Frankson Car Audio
#13
Posted 16 February 2010 - 07:35 AM
Just because an amp is rated at 300wrms x 2 doesn't mean the speakers will actually get that much. They may only be getting 150wrms...
2010 VE Commodore Series II SS-V (The new beast!)
11.97 @ 123mph
2008 VE Commodore SS-V (Retired)
12.64 @ 118mph

#14
Posted 16 February 2010 - 08:39 AM
HISPL, on Feb 16 2010, 02:19 AM, said:
150wrms would be the bare minimum I would suggest running them with.
mmmm
sounds TASTY... did you keep any pics of it?
and i remember back when i got my dyns
it was FROM 150wrms
VICTORIAN MEMBERS CLICK HERE
Pulse-R, on Oct 14 2008, 09:45PM, said:
broadz, on Aug 12 2008, 01:33 PM, said:
Mine is quite small
nuttered, on Jan 23 2006, 11:20 AM, said:
#15
Posted 16 February 2010 - 03:12 PM
Stone, on Feb 10 2010, 10:09 PM, said:
Hmm, possibly the protection was kicking in due to a slightly clipped signal?
blanketman, on Feb 15 2010, 10:39 PM, said:
sounds TASTY... did you keep any pics of it?
and i remember back when i got my dyns
it was FROM 150wrms
Sure have, I'll dig them up and get someone to show me how to post them up on the forum.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














