I suspect one or 2 of you are subscribed to Alpine Electronics Australia's newsletter.
Was anyone else interested in saving 70%^ off selected products?
I thought this could make a good Christmas present to myself and I was a little excited and hopeful.
Did anyone wonder what the ^ meant in "70%^ "?
Here's a screen capture of Alpine's advertising email and the order form.

I worked out that the ^ is the attempted disclaimer that says "we can say anything we want, misleading or otherwise, as long as there's an asterisk, only we won't use an asterisk because everyone knows that an * means there's some marketing BS and to simply ignore the advertisement."
Turns out that one example of the 70% off is a $699 saving on an RRP $999 amplifier, but only if you buy it in a package with another $999 component.
So final price is $1299 with a saving of $699.
Now if I was saving 70% from $1998, I'd expect to pay $599, not bloody $1299. The saving is actually 35% but they think they can advertise this as a 70% saving.
Is this a false and misleading advertisement?
The best offer they have is buy 1 item for $999, get a second for free. That's a 50% saving - still not touching their advertised 70% saving.
But, according to their logic, this is a 100% discount! Why didn't they advertise 100% instead of 70%. that second amplifier is absolutely free !
The fine print in the order form & website was "5) Reference to saving is based on reduction from the suppliers individual recommended price of the product included in the offer"
What that SHOULD read is that the saving is based on the price reduction being attributed to a single product in the offer.
So this means that I can sell my car for $1^.
^Car is offered as a package with 1 bottle of Car wash. The pacakge price is $13,000.
and here's another example on Alpine's website:
Quote
Purchase the PDX-F6 amplifier and SAVE 70% off a pair of SPX-17PRO Speakers!
RRP $1998
NOW $1299
I'm considering complaining to ACCC and/or the Australian Advertising Standards Bureau.
I know I'm offended by Alpine's misleading advertising. Am I being silly about it, or do you agree with me that advertisers should be accurate and not misleading and that Alpine is misleading in this case?
Opinions appreciated.
Oggy.






















