twisted pair or twin shielded coax?
#1
Posted 02 March 2006 - 08:14 PM
will soon be installing my cabling in my VS, and am undecided whether to use twin shielded coax or twisted pair audio interconnects. what would yield a cleaner sound?
also, if i do decide to go down the twisted pair path, is using 16G ofc figure 8 and twisting this (with a drill) and connecting RCA's to this be acceptable? or should proper cable be used? also, what sort of twist rate should i be using if i do decide to make my own twisted pair leads.
any advice would be great.
thanks in advance,
John.
#2
Posted 02 March 2006 - 09:46 PM
Check out this thread
Audio Myths
regarding cabling myths
-==//Clarion :: OZ Audio :: Phoenix Gold :: Vifa :: Peerless :: Dynaudio\\==-
#3
Posted 03 March 2006 - 02:10 AM
Edited by abmolech, 28 April 2008 - 01:46 PM.
#4
Posted 03 March 2006 - 08:06 AM
http://www.tnt-audio.com/clinica/diyce.html
i agree, twisted vs. coax is a bit of a myth
- Stooge007 out
Please visit the TUTORIALS and FAQs section, or try SEARCHING before posting a new topic
Also check out the Most Popular & Useful Tutorials :)
--------------------
shiny_car said:
#5
Posted 03 March 2006 - 08:30 AM
Edited by fuddbutter, 03 March 2006 - 12:06 PM.
Selling Fudd an amp (for a fraction of the real price) that had been returned by Autobarn Geelong which had been incorrectly used by AB Geelong and turned out to be faulty when Fudd started using it.
Whilst he was given a new amp after it could not be fixed, he never acknowledged any of the assistance given and bitches to this day about it.
www.fuddbutter.com
http://gallery.fuddbutter.com/zen/
MEASQ(CAASQ) Aust Champion 2005
MEASQ(CAASQ) Aust 2nd Place 2006
MEASQ(CAASQ) Vic Champion 2005
MEASQ(CAASQ) Vic Champion 2006
#6
Posted 03 March 2006 - 11:32 AM
abmolech, on Mar 3 2006, 03:10 AM, said:
While I liked most of your post, this line is completely wrong. A Balanced line cable has three wires, 1 for signal positive, 1 for signal negative and one ground.
Twisted pair cables are supposed to reduce inducted noice into the signal that it carries by twisting the two cables (signal and ground) together differently.
#7
Posted 03 March 2006 - 12:11 PM
Edited by abmolech, 28 April 2008 - 01:47 PM.
#9
Posted 03 March 2006 - 12:31 PM
Edited by abmolech, 28 April 2008 - 01:47 PM.
#10
Posted 03 March 2006 - 12:46 PM
abmolech, on Mar 3 2006, 01:31 PM, said:
And isn't that what we were all talking about?!
The problem I have with what you have posted is that whilst it relates to electronics/audio theory, it doesn't translate very well to practical use, especially with the usage in cars that this forum is dedicated to. There are some, but still not many products designed for properly balanced signals available.
abmolech, on Mar 3 2006, 01:31 PM, said:
Edited by chipa, 03 March 2006 - 12:48 PM.
#11
Posted 03 March 2006 - 12:56 PM
Edited by abmolech, 28 April 2008 - 01:47 PM.
#12
Posted 03 March 2006 - 01:10 PM
At no point did I prove or claim to have superior knowledge. I have simply tried to steer you into providing some USEFUL information. Ever hear of the KISS principle. Think about using it when giving information to others who will otherwise quite likely have no idea what you are talking about. Whilst I didn't make my intention clear, there was still no need to go into an involved discusion on balnced theory, and the clear attempt at sarcasm seems to point out whose communication skills are lacking.
I have simply asked for a basic explaination. What is wrong with that?!
And just to maybe make you feel a bit better, I'll quite HAPPILY admit that it seems you have a higher level of knowledge than me.
Edited by chipa, 03 March 2006 - 01:19 PM.
#13
Posted 03 March 2006 - 01:33 PM
Quote
Personally I have a particular dislike of this principle. (Obvious I guess)
Please feel free to edit or redo my ORIGINAL reply that complies more strictly with this all important principle.
I still believe it was
Simple
To the point.
And of direct relevance to the intended question.
I believe it was YOU who wanted more detailed response requiring an explanation of the aforementioned deliberation.
I haven't heard a complaint yet (perhaps I am not listening) from any other poster.
If you wish to question an aspect of my answer, please feel free.
You addressed a detail, I responded with detail.
Quote
An example of your communication skills?
#14
Posted 04 March 2006 - 10:51 AM
optical has none of these problems
:grin:
I have used twisted pair and co-axial RCA's, and there's no difference I can hear.
as long as you use best quality cable and connectors, there will be no problem
http://www.aes.org
MEASQ 2008 National Judges' Choice
MEASQ 2009 Victorian Runner Up - Expert Class, National Champion - Expert Class
dB Drag 2008 Street A: 147.2dB @ 46Hz
VK3TUG - Life's too short to QRP
~Spyne~, on 15 July 2009 - 07:33 PM, said:
TEAM Floor-Pods
#15
Posted 04 March 2006 - 11:07 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













