The Latest from the Australian Mobile Electronics Industry Since 1999 60,000+ Readers Per Month! Get the MEA iPhone App

Jump to content


twisted pair or twin shielded coax?


32 replies to this topic

#1 jds303

    25 - 250w RMS

  • Members
  • 72 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:WA
  • State:WA

Posted 02 March 2006 - 08:14 PM

g'day guys,
will soon be installing my cabling in my VS, and am undecided whether to use twin shielded coax or twisted pair audio interconnects. what would yield a cleaner sound?
also, if i do decide to go down the twisted pair path, is using 16G ofc figure 8 and twisting this (with a drill) and connecting RCA's to this be acceptable? or should proper cable be used? also, what sort of twist rate should i be using if i do decide to make my own twisted pair leads.
any advice would be great.
thanks in advance,
John.

#2 KickerCat

    mrs.i.r.mix.a.speaker

  • Members
  • 1,359 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Audi Arabia
  • State:VIC

Posted 02 March 2006 - 09:46 PM

The cabling you use has very little effect on the sound you get - as long as its of reasonable quality, and everything is connected well, its going to sound fine.

Check out this thread

Audio Myths

regarding cabling myths :)

-==//Clarion :: OZ Audio :: Phoenix Gold :: Vifa :: Peerless :: Dynaudio\\==-


#3 abmolech

    25 - 250w RMS

  • Members
  • 399 posts
  • State:NSW

Posted 03 March 2006 - 02:10 AM

...

Edited by abmolech, 28 April 2008 - 01:46 PM.


#4 Stooge007

    2009 - Welcome Wayne Bennett

  • Members
  • 6,301 posts
  • State:NSW

Posted 03 March 2006 - 08:06 AM

see here for making twisted RCA's:

http://www.tnt-audio.com/clinica/diyce.html

i agree, twisted vs. coax is a bit of a myth

- Stooge007 out
DISCLAIMER: by reading the above post you have absolved me of any responsibility whatsoever if what I have recommended happens to break any of your stuff, or burns your car to the ground!!!

Please visit the TUTORIALS and FAQs section, or try SEARCHING before posting a new topic

Also check out the Most Popular & Useful Tutorials :)


--------------------

shiny_car said:

i'm not here to disagree with stooge - his advice is always tops


#5 fuddbutter

    Needs to Harden the f*** up!

  • Members
  • 10,774 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • State:VIC

Posted 03 March 2006 - 08:30 AM

twisted pair reject noise in a DC enviroment, Sheilded reject noise in an AC enviroment.

Edited by fuddbutter, 03 March 2006 - 12:06 PM.

QUOTE (RMA @ Feb 6 2010, 01:22 AM) My only regrets are:
Selling Fudd an amp (for a fraction of the real price) that had been returned by Autobarn Geelong which had been incorrectly used by AB Geelong and turned out to be faulty when Fudd started using it.
Whilst he was given a new amp after it could not be fixed, he never acknowledged any of the assistance given and bitches to this day about it.

www.fuddbutter.com
http://gallery.fuddbutter.com/zen/


MEASQ(CAASQ) Aust Champion 2005
MEASQ(CAASQ) Aust 2nd Place 2006
MEASQ(CAASQ) Vic Champion 2005

MEASQ(CAASQ) Vic Champion 2006


#6 chipa

    25 - 250w RMS

  • Members
  • 70 posts
  • Location:Albury, NSW
  • State:NSW

Posted 03 March 2006 - 11:32 AM

abmolech, on Mar 3 2006, 03:10 AM, said:

Twisted pair are balanced line cables.


While I liked most of your post, this line is completely wrong. A Balanced line cable has three wires, 1 for signal positive, 1 for signal negative and one ground.

Twisted pair cables are supposed to reduce inducted noice into the signal that it carries by twisting the two cables (signal and ground) together differently.

#7 abmolech

    25 - 250w RMS

  • Members
  • 399 posts
  • State:NSW

Posted 03 March 2006 - 12:11 PM

...

Edited by abmolech, 28 April 2008 - 01:47 PM.


#8 chipa

    25 - 250w RMS

  • Members
  • 70 posts
  • Location:Albury, NSW
  • State:NSW

Posted 03 March 2006 - 12:20 PM

Please explain: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balanced_audio

#9 abmolech

    25 - 250w RMS

  • Members
  • 399 posts
  • State:NSW

Posted 03 March 2006 - 12:31 PM

...

Edited by abmolech, 28 April 2008 - 01:47 PM.


#10 chipa

    25 - 250w RMS

  • Members
  • 70 posts
  • Location:Albury, NSW
  • State:NSW

Posted 03 March 2006 - 12:46 PM

abmolech, on Mar 3 2006, 01:31 PM, said:

Is simply using the most COMMON form of a balanced LINE audio system.

And isn't that what we were all talking about?! :rolleyes:

The problem I have with what you have posted is that whilst it relates to electronics/audio theory, it doesn't translate very well to practical use, especially with the usage in cars that this forum is dedicated to. There are some, but still not many products designed for properly balanced signals available.

abmolech, on Mar 3 2006, 01:31 PM, said:

The advantage of having a "third" wire are somewhat dubious.
A basic explaination would be nice. I do have a reasonable background in electronics, sound and PA but a lot of other forum members don't.

Edited by chipa, 03 March 2006 - 12:48 PM.


#11 abmolech

    25 - 250w RMS

  • Members
  • 399 posts
  • State:NSW

Posted 03 March 2006 - 12:56 PM

...

Edited by abmolech, 28 April 2008 - 01:47 PM.


#12 chipa

    25 - 250w RMS

  • Members
  • 70 posts
  • Location:Albury, NSW
  • State:NSW

Posted 03 March 2006 - 01:10 PM

I give up!

At no point did I prove or claim to have superior knowledge. I have simply tried to steer you into providing some USEFUL information. Ever hear of the KISS principle. Think about using it when giving information to others who will otherwise quite likely have no idea what you are talking about. Whilst I didn't make my intention clear, there was still no need to go into an involved discusion on balnced theory, and the clear attempt at sarcasm seems to point out whose communication skills are lacking.

I have simply asked for a basic explaination. What is wrong with that?!

And just to maybe make you feel a bit better, I'll quite HAPPILY admit that it seems you have a higher level of knowledge than me.

Edited by chipa, 03 March 2006 - 01:19 PM.


#13 abmolech

    25 - 250w RMS

  • Members
  • 399 posts
  • State:NSW

Posted 03 March 2006 - 01:33 PM

Quote

Ever hear of the KISS principle.

Personally I have a particular dislike of this principle. (Obvious I guess)

Please feel free to edit or redo my ORIGINAL reply that complies more strictly with this all important principle.

I still believe it was

Simple
To the point.
And of direct relevance to the intended question.

I believe it was YOU who wanted more detailed response requiring an explanation of the aforementioned deliberation.

I haven't heard a complaint yet (perhaps I am not listening) from any other poster.

If you wish to question an aspect of my answer, please feel free.
You addressed a detail, I responded with detail. :unsure:

Quote

While I liked most of your post, this line is completely wrong. A Balanced line cable has three wires, 1 for signal positive, 1 for signal negative and one ground.

An example of your communication skills?

#14 Pulse-R

    Digital is only on or off

  • Verified Trader
  • 11,176 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Melbourne, VIC
  • Interests:Audio, Computers, Mobile Electronics
  • State:VIC

Posted 04 March 2006 - 10:51 AM

balanced, unbalanced..... whatever
optical has none of these problems
:grin:

I have used twisted pair and co-axial RCA's, and there's no difference I can hear.

as long as you use best quality cable and connectors, there will be no problem
http://www.melbourneaudioclub.org.au
http://www.aes.org
MEASQ 2008 National Judges' Choice
MEASQ 2009 Victorian Runner Up - Expert Class, National Champion - Expert Class
dB Drag 2008 Street A: 147.2dB @ 46Hz
VK3TUG - Life's too short to QRP

~Spyne~, on 15 July 2009 - 07:33 PM, said:

gear = wank unless it's installed
Note to self: Install more gear.
TEAM Floor-Pods

#15 Stone

    3kW Power House

  • Members
  • 7,048 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Mornington Peninsula
  • State:VIC

Posted 04 March 2006 - 11:07 AM

Same here... I have both types of RCA in my car and can't hear any interference from either.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users