working out T.H.D specs when bridged
#1
Posted 05 January 2007 - 10:54 PM
Also what is a good seperation factor for a entry level comp SQ amp?
4.5L of turbochaged, Quad cam V8 goodness
HU: Alpine 9855R
Front stage: Peerless HDS 6.5" mids and Vifa XT25 tweeters
Front Stage Amp: Schneider SPA-4
Rear Fill: nil
Sub: XTANT 12" hex Sub Amp: E-Audio 1000D

#2
Posted 05 January 2007 - 11:40 PM
However, if you can hear THD below 1%, Ill need you to tune my car
THD is the spec quoted, but its not even the most audible of all the distortions. Ignore it.
Seperation factors generally wont be more then around 60dB for high-end amps. Its another one of those specs that dont mean a thing when starting or upgrading a decent system. People who are after strict seperation choose dual monoblocks (2-channel amps with dual power supplies) or run amps per side (one for left and one for right).
On my list of important things to look for in an amp, THD and Seperation rate right up there with ability to blow bubbles and draw cartoons.
My list is as follows (no particular order)
-Build Quality - Have a look at the guts. Is it a logical flow, or is it haphazard?
-How stable is it? What is its lowest rating?
-What is its power ratings into the drivers Im using (CEA2006 ratings only)? Does it have the power supply capable?
-What does it look like? Does it match everything else I have?
-Price. Is it too cheap for its 'claimed' figures? Indicates corners cut in manufacture. Pay peanuts, get monkeys.
-Does it have any 'special' bits of gear that are unique to that brand? Why? Do I need them, or just want them?

Its all about the music. Always has been, always will be. Im here for the music.
#3
Posted 06 January 2007 - 09:15 AM
4.5L of turbochaged, Quad cam V8 goodness
HU: Alpine 9855R
Front stage: Peerless HDS 6.5" mids and Vifa XT25 tweeters
Front Stage Amp: Schneider SPA-4
Rear Fill: nil
Sub: XTANT 12" hex Sub Amp: E-Audio 1000D

#4
Posted 06 January 2007 - 09:25 AM
~thematt~, on Jan 5 2007, 11:40 PM, said:
Hallelujah!!!
I used to have arguements with customers who were worried that one CD player had 0.005%THD and the other 0.007% THD.
When I played a test CD with the same track recorded at increasing distortion levels. a lot of the time it would get to 10% before most people picked it.
Maybe it's because I wasn't using $3000 directional RCAs.
Phil
Edited by DD Phil, 06 January 2007 - 09:25 AM.

RE Audio -- US Amps -- CDT Audio -- Cactus Sounds -- ZED Audio -- Zapco
Builder of the loudest car in Australia 1999-2009
First over 155, 160 and 165dB
#6
Posted 06 January 2007 - 03:49 PM
~thematt~, on Jan 6 2007, 10:14 AM, said:
But I'm broke after buying my $50k speaker cables.
Phil

RE Audio -- US Amps -- CDT Audio -- Cactus Sounds -- ZED Audio -- Zapco
Builder of the loudest car in Australia 1999-2009
First over 155, 160 and 165dB
#7
Posted 06 January 2007 - 03:55 PM
DD Phil, on Jan 6 2007, 04:49 PM, said:
Phil
that are also directional!
- mad89
- /////ALPINE - rainbow - TOTAL RECOIL - BostonAcoustics - Stinger - Aerpro - Dynamat -
- Presented By -
- /////ALPINE - CRESCENDO - TRU Technology - DYNAUDIO - Stinger - Dynamat -
- Presented By -
:Trusted Buyers/Sellers:
- poisoner - trism - Fhrx - Gozza - nee - Leviathan - mac_man_luke - edy - Marc - advance - Tiger - Vazard -
- Big_Valven - Mafish - raff - Westy87 - cc1206 - hilas07 - Nic - sqking - SMI7HY - Elmo - keeddlez - MRVJ -
- sunday_diver - Daedalus - FL0SSIN - broadz - Gonadman2 - MR_XR6 - TEGBOY - nemesis - sliksilvia - sanzy -
- SStealth - Deftone2k - Tezza_VESSV - PURESX - SINTX3 - Doorslammer - orsm-vs - Syd_pulsin -
#8
Posted 06 January 2007 - 03:56 PM
Phil

RE Audio -- US Amps -- CDT Audio -- Cactus Sounds -- ZED Audio -- Zapco
Builder of the loudest car in Australia 1999-2009
First over 155, 160 and 165dB
#9
Posted 06 January 2007 - 06:26 PM

Its all about the music. Always has been, always will be. Im here for the music.
#10
Posted 06 January 2007 - 07:10 PM
do you think its worth me getting another 4 channel amp (a crossfire 404 specifically) so that I can bridge all the channels effectively giving me 4 channels each with seperate gains, and at least 150WRMS to each speaker.
I dont need anywhere near that power for my system as I want SQ not SPL, but I figure that if your not working the amp as hard you wont have any distortion/clipping ect.
Do I have the right idea?
The new system will be
-Alpine headunit with bass engine pro, 9855R most likely
-Peerless HDS 6.5" mids
-Vifa XT25 tweeters
-At least the alpine 3554 4 channel amp, maybe the crossfire 404 as well
-Boston G2 12" sub
-Crossfire 602 Class A/B sub amp
I have bought or ordered all but the headunit, and sold off my current headunit, splits and front stage amp.
I plan on competing in CAASQWA
Links
Crossfire amps (602, 404)- http://www.crossfirecaraudio.com/frameset.asp (tech info>amplifiers>class AB)
Alpine -http://ampguts.realmofexcursion.com/Alpine_3554/
Alpine 9855R- Alpine.com.au (search)
4.5L of turbochaged, Quad cam V8 goodness
HU: Alpine 9855R
Front stage: Peerless HDS 6.5" mids and Vifa XT25 tweeters
Front Stage Amp: Schneider SPA-4
Rear Fill: nil
Sub: XTANT 12" hex Sub Amp: E-Audio 1000D

#11
Posted 06 January 2007 - 08:00 PM
You have all the power you need to maintain linearity, dynamics, clarity and headroom. More is just wasted, because it really wont be used.

Its all about the music. Always has been, always will be. Im here for the music.
#12
Posted 06 January 2007 - 08:34 PM
~thematt~, on Jan 6 2007, 07:00 PM, said:
You have all the power you need to maintain linearity, dynamics, clarity and headroom. More is just wasted, because it really wont be used.
ok and the specs on the crossfire are good enough for competition use?
4.5L of turbochaged, Quad cam V8 goodness
HU: Alpine 9855R
Front stage: Peerless HDS 6.5" mids and Vifa XT25 tweeters
Front Stage Amp: Schneider SPA-4
Rear Fill: nil
Sub: XTANT 12" hex Sub Amp: E-Audio 1000D

#13
Posted 06 January 2007 - 09:43 PM
'being good enough for competition' isnt what you should be designing your system for. You should be designing it for your pleasure, nothing more. And the crossfire is perfectly fine for that.
That being said, seeing as I may be some of your 'competition', Id say No

Its all about the music. Always has been, always will be. Im here for the music.
#14
Posted 06 January 2007 - 10:29 PM
~thematt~, on Jan 6 2007, 08:43 PM, said:
'being good enough for competition' isnt what you should be designing your system for. You should be designing it for your pleasure, nothing more. And the crossfire is perfectly fine for that.
That being said, seeing as I may be some of your 'competition', Id say No
I say good enough for competition because competition spec is a benchmark for clarity, I wont care if I LOVE my sysstem yet dont place well in a comp, but I see the competition as a way of getting useful feedback and the factor to keep striving to get the most out of my system.
Cheers for your help
4.5L of turbochaged, Quad cam V8 goodness
HU: Alpine 9855R
Front stage: Peerless HDS 6.5" mids and Vifa XT25 tweeters
Front Stage Amp: Schneider SPA-4
Rear Fill: nil
Sub: XTANT 12" hex Sub Amp: E-Audio 1000D

#15
Posted 06 January 2007 - 11:51 PM
Crossfire amps arent bad, they certainly do produce some decent power, but I havent heard any myself to determine whether or not I could consider them sufficient SQ material for my tastes.
I have an amp with approx the same specs, and Ive bridged it to my midbass. Personally (just my opinion), but if you were to get an amp such as that one, it would be best NOT bridging the channels and just running all 4. If its anything similar to my SRx4, the bridged channels actually muddy up the midbass quite a lot. Not favourable for accuracy.

Its all about the music. Always has been, always will be. Im here for the music.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













