The Latest from the Australian Mobile Electronics Industry Since 1999 60,000+ Readers Per Month! Get the MEA iPhone App

Jump to content


10" or 12"?


27 replies to this topic

#1 ilpala

    0 - 25w RMS

  • Members
  • 15 posts
  • State:VIC

Posted 10 January 2007 - 12:03 PM

Im not interested in competitions or in having a system where the bass drowns out all the other speakers. I love rock music but at the same time i love house music which has a lot of bass and i want to know if im better off sticking with 12" subs or going for 10" subs which im told are better for what i want.

Also, should i get 2ohm or 4ohm subs? I read the tutorial on amps and i understand that 2ohm delivers more power than 4ohm. But is it too much power for me.. i'll be running alpine pdx amps if that helps.

I'd appreciate your opinions.

Edited by vas, 10 January 2007 - 12:07 PM.


#2 Shreknos

    Its hammer time!

  • Members
  • 1,682 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sunny Berwick
  • State:VIC

Posted 10 January 2007 - 12:11 PM

dont follow the common misconception that 10 inch subs are tight and fast and that 15 inch subs are slow and pplay lower...


an 8 inch sub can play almost as low as an 18, in the right enclosure, and an 18 can be just as fast and tight as an 8 in the right enclosure...

so, get a sub according to how much room your willing to sacrifice to the box, and also, how much out put you want, as bigger subs are generally louder
RS Sport "SQ Edition"

Clarion HXD2

Crescendo Opus 8.6

Fi Audio Q 12"

JL Audio 300/4

JL Audio 500/1

#3 20Hurtz

    1500 - 3000w RMS

  • Members
  • 2,402 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • State:NT

Posted 10 January 2007 - 12:54 PM

i personally like tens a bit better, i know there shouldn't be a real difference but they seem to blend with my front stage a bit better, i especially like tens for rock.
Dan Wiggins "Skepticism about the unknown is a good thing; skepticism without reason, in the face of proof, is foolhardy."

#4 ProClass

    500 - 1500w RMS

  • Members
  • 767 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brisbane
  • Interests:Enjoyment. Plain and simple. I live to enjoy.
  • State:QLD

Posted 10 January 2007 - 12:59 PM

-Charlie-, on Jan 10 2007, 12:11 PM, said:

dont follow the common misconception that 10 inch subs are tight and fast and that 15 inch subs are slow and pplay lower...
an 8 inch sub can play almost as low as an 18, in the right enclosure, and an 18 can be just as fast and tight as an 8 in the right enclosure...

so, get a sub according to how much room your willing to sacrifice to the box, and also, how much out put you want, as bigger subs are generally louder
Strictly speaking in terms of MASS larger drivers are slower and will sound more sloppy.
IMO 10's are the go.
:-) >Call'm like I hear'm< )-:

Owner/Designer/Builder IASCA/CAN/NT National Champions 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990
Designer/Builder of IASCA World Champions 1991, 1992, 1993
Designer/Builder of IASCA Australian State/National Champions 1996, 1997, 1998
Mobile Dynamics Accredited Workshop Instructor
GAIT Accredited - IASCA Accredited SQ/Install
CAASQ Judge

#5 philz

    1500 - 3000w RMS

  • Members
  • 2,384 posts
  • State:NSW

Posted 10 January 2007 - 01:06 PM

i would go ten, ive had 12's and jsut something about them i don't quite like them as much as 10's, and im a sucker for low loud bass, but always liked the 10s.

ermm what pdx amp is it? which one? 2chan, 4chan or mono?

If its the 2 channel/4 channel get a single 4ohm sub or a dual 2ohm sub.

If its the pdx mono- get a single 2 ohm or dual 4ohm
Clarion DPX2251 for sale.

#6 kiwi

    500 - 1500w RMS

  • Members
  • 809 posts
  • State:QLD

Posted 10 January 2007 - 01:08 PM

I run 10's because I only have 5.25 fronts.. it will depend on what makes up the rest of your system. If you have 6.5's then maybe go for a 12. There seems to be a lot more options for 12's than 10's these days for some reason, probably to do with the 12 being most popular. A Dual Voice Coil sub will allow you to run in different configurations.
A single DVC (4ohm) sub could be run at 2, 4 or 8ohm in the likely event that you modify your system in the future.
IPB ImageIPB ImageIPB Image IPB Image

"I choose old school... I mean, thats all the wife will let me choose LOL"

#7 20Hurtz

    1500 - 3000w RMS

  • Members
  • 2,402 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • State:NT

Posted 10 January 2007 - 01:31 PM

mass doesn't enter the equation. If anything mass will make it sound a bit exagerated, inductance is the one to watch for. either way the enclosure will make more of a difference the a bit of a difference in inductance or even in the dampening factor in the amp driving the sub.
Dan Wiggins "Skepticism about the unknown is a good thing; skepticism without reason, in the face of proof, is foolhardy."

#8 Shreknos

    Its hammer time!

  • Members
  • 1,682 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sunny Berwick
  • State:VIC

Posted 10 January 2007 - 01:42 PM

Quote

in terms of MASS larger drivers are slower and will sound more sloppy.


mass is compensated for with larger voice coil, more flux in the motor...


proclass you should know better...

the only reason a 10 would be better is because the cone is smaller, meaning less area not being pushed by the former or controlled by the surround..
RS Sport "SQ Edition"

Clarion HXD2

Crescendo Opus 8.6

Fi Audio Q 12"

JL Audio 300/4

JL Audio 500/1

#9 20Hurtz

    1500 - 3000w RMS

  • Members
  • 2,402 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • State:NT

Posted 10 January 2007 - 01:56 PM

no a larger voice coil will add to the mass, its hardly a compensation, a larger coil increases the power handling but lowers efficency (as it makes the mms greater).

once again, wieght may make it sound a bit sloppy (which can to an extent be controlled by altering the vas) but lag/response of the subwoofer itself is to do with the inductance funnily enough by enlarging the coil you increase the inductance.

Quote

the only reason a 10 would be better is because the cone is smaller, meaning less area not being pushed by the former or controlled by the surround..

could you explain that I didn't quite understand what you where trying to say?
Dan Wiggins "Skepticism about the unknown is a good thing; skepticism without reason, in the face of proof, is foolhardy."

#10 jasonakafreaky

    25 - 250w RMS

  • Members
  • 125 posts
  • Location:Brissy
  • State:QLD

Posted 10 January 2007 - 02:29 PM

I think I know what Charlie is going on about;

a good example would be comparing balancing something at the end of a short stick and balancing something with a slightly longer stick.

The longer the stick, the more concentration or balance is required.

In a subwoofer's case; more control...
I reckon that is true to a certain extent, but also concur that any good sub regardless of size in a properly designed box would sound good.

#11 20Hurtz

    1500 - 3000w RMS

  • Members
  • 2,402 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • State:NT

Posted 10 January 2007 - 03:25 PM

it wo'nt make any difference if your holding the middle of the stick (spider) and the top of the thing your balancing (surround) then it won't really matter how long the stick (former) is, look at the 06 re xxx absolutely massively long former/vc assembly but this is an extremely low distrortion driver! Very high SQ
Dan Wiggins "Skepticism about the unknown is a good thing; skepticism without reason, in the face of proof, is foolhardy."

#12 Juan Pablo Costanzo

    25 - 250w RMS

  • Members
  • 450 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Melbourne
  • State:VIC

Posted 10 January 2007 - 03:43 PM

20Hurtz, i understand that the box will make more of a difference then small differences in Le as you posted above, but bear with me and feel free to correct any oversights/misunderstandings on my part while i indulge in some theory:

Generally, dont higher impedance voice coils have higher inductance then there lower counterparts? For example, T1 Rockfords:

T115D4 has Le of 6.0mH compared to the D2 version which has Le 4.2mH. For comparison, the T110D4 Le 4.6mH, T110D2 3.0mH. (dont know at what freq, with coils in series)

So if "sloppiness" is mostly determined by inductance, i.e the higher the inductance the longer it holds current and resists change, then shouldnt the question no longer be between 10 or 12 inch, but "i listen to dance should i get the D2 or D4 version" Because based on the above the 15D2 had lower inductance then the 10D4, which would mean that box considerations aside, the 15 would be "faster"

Edited by Joey Peeps, 10 January 2007 - 03:45 PM.

Rockford Fosgate * Digital Designs * Boston Acoustics * Pioneer
st c: 144.6



#13 20Hurtz

    1500 - 3000w RMS

  • Members
  • 2,402 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • State:NT

Posted 10 January 2007 - 04:03 PM

well joey that is something! It never crossed my mind that different impediance coils would have different inductance values but i guess higher resistance coils would be smaller in gauge, as a result to achieve the same vc lenght as the lower resistance coils the higher resistance VC would have to have more turns, le is directly proportional to the number of turns in the inductor.

some one please correct me if i'm wrong :)
Dan Wiggins "Skepticism about the unknown is a good thing; skepticism without reason, in the face of proof, is foolhardy."

#14 Pulse-R

    Digital is only on or off

  • Verified Trader
  • 11,176 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Melbourne, VIC
  • Interests:Audio, Computers, Mobile Electronics
  • State:VIC

Posted 10 January 2007 - 04:10 PM

bigger woofers usually have higher MMS too - so that would slow them down again.

Higher Le will interact more with the magnetic field, meaning higher SPL for a given input current.
http://www.melbourneaudioclub.org.au
http://www.aes.org
MEASQ 2008 National Judges' Choice
MEASQ 2009 Victorian Runner Up - Expert Class, National Champion - Expert Class
dB Drag 2008 Street A: 147.2dB @ 46Hz
VK3TUG - Life's too short to QRP

~Spyne~, on 15 July 2009 - 07:33 PM, said:

gear = wank unless it's installed
Note to self: Install more gear.
TEAM Floor-Pods

#15 20Hurtz

    1500 - 3000w RMS

  • Members
  • 2,402 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • State:NT

Posted 10 January 2007 - 04:18 PM

no disrespect simon but i'm gonna have to call you on both of those points. Could you perhaps explain a little more indepth, how and why?
Dan Wiggins "Skepticism about the unknown is a good thing; skepticism without reason, in the face of proof, is foolhardy."





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users