One interesting thing to consider... it may be worth firing up a CD with some test tones on it.
I wacked one into my car myself and found that pretty much regardless of how loud I turned it, I was unable to actually
hear anything below about 25hz.
That said, if I enabled a 25hz (or eve 20hz) HPF on the sub I did notice the change so there is no doubt that it's percievable, just not audiable to my ears.
May be worth considering this
Luke352, on Aug 25 2007, 02:06 PM, said:
Pulse R has made some very good points, what most people think is 20hz is probably closer to 40hz, and if you really want to play down to 20hz with any kind of presence (volume isn't the word because 20hz is basically getting into the inaudible range) you need to be able to move SERIOUS amounts of air, 1x12" really aint gonna cut it for real 20hz output, two 15's is where you really want to be looking or 3 or more 12's.
I wouldn't say that, depends on how much output you are after at 20hz. If you wan't -3dB @ 20hz then that is quite achievable with a number of subs. Bassbox indicates -3dB incar with my Vanadium in 34L (a little bigger then recommended) and it's a great sounding sub (and for sale at the moment!).
The new aluminium cone Peerless XXLS 12" indicates 21.5hz @ 0dB in it's optimal 44L sealed enclosure as well which is extremely low. -3dB is at an indicated 17hz. That said, it also indicates a 4dB peak at 37hz in this sized enclosure, so that could pose a potential problem in terms of linearity.
The XXLS 10" indicates -3dB @ 25hz in it's optimal 17.5L, but this is likely not deep enough for your tastes, for what you suggest - it does however have an amazingly flat response with the response curve indicating +/-2dB from 50hz - 800hz in free air, and bassbox indicating impressive linearity in-car also.
IDMAX shows an indicated -3dB @ 25hz also, in it's optimal 28L sealed - so you are looking at similar depth to the 10" XXLS.
If you are after 0dB @ 20hz, then you are pretty limited. TheMatt mentioned TC sounds, which is a defiante option if you can get the enclosure right. My brother uses an Eclipse model that is based on the TC sounds design (build by TC sounds, if memory serves me correcly). I belive they are around the $500rrp mark, and these things are one of the deepest playing 12" subs on the planet. These subs have over 30mm of one way, linear excursion so which probably helps to bring about the rediculous depth .. something along the lines of -3dB @ 16hz
without cabin gain in 34L sealed.
Note on these though - they
must be used in sealed enclosures. Eclipse actually declare in their manual that your warranty is void if the woofers are used in a ported enclosure. The other problem? They have rediculously low sensitivity (something around 83 or 84dB for the 12") which means you need an absolutely truckload of power to get them to move. My brother is running his bridged off 600w rms and had to get the gains up to about half way before the sub was even audiable. I'd say don't bother with this sub unless you have some serious power available. They are also single voice coil (LVC technology) which makes wiring up a pair of them pretty easy (8ohm or 2ohm load). In terms of SQ, they are abosolutely brililant, and are one of the lowest distortion subs out there - apparently one of the only subs with lower distortion levels then the previous generation XXLS subs (the new aluminium ones are a different design).
Phew... that leaves me about out of breath, hope that helped
Edited by muzzy66, 28 August 2007 - 05:41 PM.