lancer guy
Dec 22 2002, 12:42 PM
I was driving to work this morning listening to a minidisc of a live recording off that I recorded off the radio of Area 7 and I was thinking that it sounded crap - there was a definite lack in high frequencies compared to most other discs. Strange thing is I used to listen to this disc quite a bit and used to think it sounded great. Looks like SQ has finally bitten.
you could record live on super cd or dvd audio and it'd still sound about the same. A live recording you've done no way compares to something created professionaly and expesnvily in a studio (**** i cant spell).
If you bought a md of your fav artist at the shop, then you bought the same cd, I doubt you could tell the difference ...
Sir BoomsAlot
Dec 23 2002, 02:41 AM
i didnt like the way my system sounded when it was setup for spl but ive changed some of the settings and im happy with the way it sounds. SQ is definently the way to go.
NUTTTR
Dec 22 2002, 10:38 PM
Most people don't "realise" how their system sounds, until they listen to one that is "really good" thats how i was "converted", in a way...... but hey SQL rocks, i've got lots of SQ and LOUD
lol
Aaron
Macca
Dec 23 2002, 12:01 AM
Could have sounded crap as it was recorded off the radio
lancer guy
Dec 23 2002, 01:18 PM
I think the radio recording had a lot to do with it sounding crap. The point is though that up till recently I would have thought that cause it wasn't distorting it sounded good but now I'm becoming more aware of what good sound really is.
shiny_car
Dec 23 2002, 08:38 PM
it's good to see your ears are becoming attuned to what does and doesn't sound good.
it's both good and bad: for it will help you setup and build your system into something much nicer...but then again it will entice you to spend more $$!
Macca
Dec 23 2002, 08:54 PM
quote:
Originally posted by shiny_car:
[b]it's good to see your ears are becoming attuned to what does and doesn't sound good.
eyes closed listining to the previews,
then hoped in the car after with the dodgie stock speaks and ma 8" and boy was the sound stage low and L/R was too distingushable
hardon
Dec 24 2002, 02:32 AM
The FM broadcasting standard has a limited frequency response, and a very low channel separation, that could be why; when u listen to a cd and then flick on the radio (and not get a commercial) the sound quality is waaay worse...
The minidisc recording doesn't lose any quality in playback, it only plays as good as the source it was recorded from.
[ December 24, 2002, 00:35: Message edited by: hardon ]
sbadman
Dec 30 2002, 12:51 PM
QUOTE
Originally posted by hardon:
The minidisc recording doesn't lose any quality in playback, it only plays as good as the source it was recorded from.
Not quite so actually...
Minidiscs use a compressed format similar to MP3 to fit the equivilant of a CD onto something the size of a 3.5" floppy.
As to whether you can actaully hear the difference, trust your ears, or search for the plentiful MP3 vs CD threads
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.