Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Angling Mids
Mobile Electronics Australia > Mobile Electronics Discussion > Sound Quality Discussion
mike_bblue
What are peoples opinions on angling the mid drivers? I am setting up a Patrol WGN which is a high vehicle with the position of the mids in the bottom of the doors.

People talk about angling tweeters at the head rests of opposite seats, but what about the mids?

Thanks for any opinions or experiences!!

I can't install or try anything yet so I may as well talk about it!!!
vti-2
In short, mids aren't as directional as tweeters, which is why they do not have to be angled as much. That's not to say you won't have to angle them, depending on how far or high you are from the speakers will affect how severely you will need to angle them.
Cyberpunky
Several factors are in play with mids including on/off axis response, distance from opposing mid, and freq range they play.

Phase issues are common with mids that are not angled, as the wave length of freqs played by mids will often result in some destructive standing waves and also some constructive standing waves. Without getting into it too much, the bottom line is that just using as little as 15 degrees from vertical of angle is enough to avoid standing wave issues.

Wether more agrressive angling will do anything depends on off axis response of particular driver, or more correctly, lack of off axis response.

The only way to find out if more agressive angling will be of benefit is to try it, but using a little angling will be of significant benefit and so well worth trying. More agressive angling may intrude on leg room and so take into account livabilty of this before going too hard core with pods.

Anyway using slight angling(15 degrees) towards middle of roof (like tweeters) may be of benefit, but going for more angle may or may not make a difference, and only trying it would tell.
peace
Cyberpunky
mike_bblue
Excellent, this is just the information I needed. I was going to angle them radically, but I was worried about water and dust ingress. But I knew I should get some angle on it.

Great info, do people incline the infill speakers/splits in the rear?? This would suggest they should. I was going to anyway, to angle them up a bit.

cheers

Mike L
DrEvil
Take a look at pics of T-Bro's pods for an example of "extreme angling" hehehe

I don't know what the difference would be without such an incline, but i love it just the way it is!
shiny_car
QUOTE
Originally posted by Cyberpunky:
Several factors are in play with mids including on/off axis response, distance from opposing mid, and freq range they play.
yeah, in a 2-way setup, you would expect the woofer to have to play up to around 3kHz. and frequencies above ~1kHz are fairly 'directional', moreso the higher you go. so IMO it's worth angling the woofer of a 2-way setup. in a 3-way setup, the midrange speaker will definitely benefit from angling, and given it is usually relatively small, should be fairly easy to achieve.

in building an angled pod, it's only worth doing if you do it properly. no point having a 'leaky' pod or a loose-fitting speaker. so ensure it's air-tight and provides a solid mount for the speaker, and you will achieve best results.

in my setup, i've retained stock door trims and grills, so i was limited to ~15 degrees of angling. i never did a comparison between angled and not angled, but i figure it helps.

good luck

[ February 27, 2003, 21:12: Message edited by: shiny_car ]
finetune
See if you can set them up in a temp position both angled and non. Have a listen to both for a while and see what you think.

My original pods were flat and my new ones have abut 20degrees on them.
I have a sneaking suspicion that they sounded better how they were originally. Tweeters in both cases were angled about the same.
This is in a big car like yours.(a Landcruiser)
mike_bblue
Thanks people, some great experience here. I have a two way and hopefully I can change this into a three way + sub + rear fill. I will wait till I get the setup before building pods. Any thoughts on the rearfill? I have some 2-ways at present. Will the tweets cause problems?
shiny_car
QUOTE
Originally posted by Mike_L:
Any thoughts on the rearfill? I have some 2-ways at present. Will the tweets cause problems?
where will they be positioned? in the doors or elsewhere? given the 'wagon' nature of the patrol, i figure they'll be in the doors.

as such, and as i've found with my rears being in the doors down low, door-mounting can be detrimental to the front soundstage. any amount of audible volume from the rears means treble arises from down low and behind, and this adversely affects the height of the front soundstage.

so if you are building the system mostly for yourself, and for SQ, then you probably don't need any rears.

door mounting is fine if used primarily for rear passengers. even go as far as to angle mount for better rear-seat listening.

however, if you want rears for 'rear fill', then they are best up higher. sedans benefit from being able to mount them on the parcel shelf, and this is where i will mount my new rears.

if you're on a tight budget, then a set of drop-in 2-way coaxials would be ideal. still worth mounting them securely and sound deadening the area. if you can splurge, then a nice set of 2-way splits, even the same as the front, would be perfect.

good luck
mike_bblue
My idea was to give the rear passengers something and so the tweeters could be angled for them. There is a pillar between the back two seat rows that I could mount them in but this points them forward which is the wrong way, but it would get them up higher.

Thanks for the great info

Cheers

Mike L
Maz
dont put the tweeters on the centre pillar firing forward, it will actually sound quieter in the rear and will now sound shockign in the front. I was going to put a set of tweeters in the centre pillar firing rear ward, but i just put the second set up the front
finetune
Have them in the rear doors and fade them in when you have passengers and out when you want more front stage.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.