beaver429
May 4 2003, 11:40 PM
I would like poeples suggestion on how to acheive more focused and tighter bass from my dd drive subs. I have them in 1.2 cubes each running of around 600 rms. Crossover set at 75hz, narrow q setting, moderate gains. I dont see what is causing the 'muddy'bass that i am getting. I even put a pillow in the boxes to reduce volume, but this really didn't do a great deal. Is my box leaky? I have no freakin idea. Any thoughts ?
Cheers
The beaver
Heres a test you can do. Find a song that has a very tight kick drum with just the kick drum going for part of the song.
Disconnect the cabin speakers and notice how any bit of punch you had is now gone. This is because the front speakers provide the punch, the initial attack of a kick drum is often as high as 200hz. This is entirely played by the fronts. A large majority of the kick drum is also above 70hz, which is also played by the fronts.
So to make everything more punchy you have to concentrate on your front speakers. For one, sound deadening and sealing your doors will dramatically boost the output of the front speakers. This will allow them to play the 70-100hz stuff alot louder than before, by doing this alone will give you heaps more punch.
splbound
May 5 2003, 03:47 AM
Excellent point Maz... If you percieve "tightness" as a defined sharp initial attack to the bass then your front stage definitely has to be considered. People nowadays seem to put so much importance on subs that they oversee the importance the front stage especially when it covers a much wider frequency band. In this case getting the front stage to perform with authority especially in the midbass 250Hz to 80Hz will improve your tightness situation.
On the other hand if you percieve "tightness" to be contolled bass eg. the bass note stops when its supposed to and dosent drone on to mix in with the next one. Then you will probably have to look more toward the box design or amplifier power.
It just depends on how you percieve "tightness" to be.
IMO that sloppy bass that doesn't start and stop as quick as possible also has alot to do with the front stage aswell.
The main problem that makes the bass sound sloppy is that you dont have much sound deadening. The panels continue to vibrate after each bass hit making the sub lag and seem loose.
Mr Bob spent over $1000 deadening his car and he won Sydneys motor show SQ comp.
I reccon its time to buy $100 worth of deadener and do your whole car, it will be very good for Sound quality
Poida
May 5 2003, 10:07 PM
The DDDrive i have in the car is in a roughly 1 cube FG box, bass is certainly very tight. Xover is set at around 60hz i think
beaver429
May 5 2003, 11:37 PM
I spent around $600 on sound deadening in my ute, i even did the roof and inside the actual door trims. My dyn 3 ways are set at 55hz, cause i dont play them loud and brings the bass forward, they are fully sealed and are on thick mdf baffles with dynamat in the doors. I am happy with the performance of them but i still feel it is my subs that are letting the show down. Maybe i should get someone to tune it on an RTA.
splbound
May 6 2003, 02:55 AM
QUOTE
Originally posted by Maz:
IMO that sloppy bass that doesn't start and stop as quick as possible also has alot to do with the front stage aswell.
I kinda meant something like sub overhang.. ie the box might not offer enough control over the sub.
Mr_Bob
May 6 2003, 11:26 AM
55Hz sounds a bit too low to me, are they the 7" dyn set?
if so 55Hz wouldn't be too bad, otherwise i'd raise it.
Making the FS play lower than optimum can cause control issues.
drums would have very little "sound" under 55Hz, so i doubt it has anything to do with your sub.
my fronts are HP'd around 70Hz, so my sub would play some harmonics.
Maz: i actually won street class (not the whole SQ comp )
i'm sure the sound deadening had alot to do with it. over 100Kg of the stuff
it cost more than $1000, it was also serenity max, and that was at bulk rates
Beaver, i don't think an RTA will help you attack and control aren't measured on an RTA, only spectural balance.
you may benefit from time alignment, depending on where your problem is.
T-Bro
May 6 2003, 11:41 AM
one thing i learnt early in my entry to car audio, is that the first thing most amateurs do with their new sub-box, is crank it up as hard as it will go. i did this myself, wanting to get value for money and all i drove around with my first subbox, and i thought to myself THIS SOUNDS TERRIBLE! i couldnt believe everyone was crazy over subs, when they made a system sound this muddy, boomy, with so much drone and flabbiness. before long, i realised that balance was the key, integration many call it - and have had infinitely better luck since.
so anyway, one of the problems with the forums is that advice is sought from people, without knowing those peoples particular habits, preferences or system sound. so what one person regards as tight, may be very different to the person offering advice. i know none of this answeres the question, but one thing i DO know is that whan it comes to bass, everyone's views are different
[white lie]
May 6 2003, 04:42 PM
very valid point T-Bro...IMO that is where you are going wrong
you seem to have everything else right, ie big front stage, small boxes, lots of deadening material, so i think its just the power ratio you've got wrong
you say the subs are running off 600WRMS, how much is then going to the front stage? i would be feeding at least 200W per side to the dyn 3 ways...and you may even be able to go lower with the LP point for the sub or raise the HP point for the dyns a touch
beaver429
May 11 2003, 10:38 PM
Thanks for the replies ppl, bob my dyns are the 7" , i dont play them loud and dont listen to bass heavy music, so i might get away with it.
I think i have my power right, around 200rms at the front and i think that a bridged 1505 alpine 'çan' produce around 900 rms on a good day( levels are down a fair bit ) .
I think my box volume may be the issue, i am going to bring it down to 1 cuft and see how this goes. Also i found that adjusting the crossover points an q factor did the subs some justice. The biggest effect was the gains, increasing the gains gave the more precision. I spose it comes down to the saying trial and error.
Time alignment might be an issue, but my pxa is outta action. Ordered a control from japan 2 months ago, still no sign.
Thanks everyone
The Beaver
[ May 11, 2003, 20:41: Message edited by: beaver429 ]
Cyberpunky
May 11 2003, 11:22 PM
Your doing what i would suggest and thats reduce the volume of box. An easy way to reduce box volume is to use polystyrene foam blocks, which wont add much weight, and can be cut etc easily. Just add enough to reduce volume to desired level (1 cube sounds about right with that sub in my experience).
peace
Cyberpunky
Pioneerguss
May 18 2003, 12:13 PM
which way should i face my SUB
honour77
May 19 2003, 03:40 PM
Just a casual opinion, but i think if tighter bass is your ultimate objective, at all costs, then the easiest(but by no means the best) way i think would just be to use a subsonic filter and filter out all the really low subbass frequencies which will never sound 'tight'. Though in the interests of musical accuracy, i wouldnt use such a filter unless it was to filter out only the inaudible frequencies
Dr DJ Choss
May 19 2003, 11:06 PM
smaller sized enclosure from stats and fill it with pillows or similar
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.