Suprathai
Jan 3 2004, 05:40 PM
Hi everyone,
Just like an opinion based on peoples experience or just plain bias for them. I'm going to be putting a small sub into my rolla. I've checked strathfield cars and they have a 12" sony sub in a enclosure for $129, or a 10" pioneer sub for $99. Which do you think would represent more value for money?. I can build an enclosure (simple as). But alot of people say that the sony subs are not very good. Also i've always regarded Pioneer as the better brand. So i was just wondering would the 10" sound better really.
So would just want to know what everyone else thinks of them.
Pioneer
http://www.strathfield.com.au/Product.asp?ProdID=271# Sony
http://www.strathfield.com.au/Product.asp?ProdID=272
Anonymous
Jan 3 2004, 05:48 PM
IMO any $100.00 will be a complete waste of money.
neither pioneer or sony make high quality subwoofers below $600.00 as both of their lower range of stuff is quite poor, it doesnt improve until u get into a very high end range.
For a good budget subwoofer i would go fora 12", 'sq' will be very similar between both a 10 and a 12. I personally wouldnt look past the Phoenix Gold Octane R sub, installed one in a Volvo here in perth and the SQ of it was sensational for under $200.00
When choosing between sizes of subs your three main considerations should be:
**Size available (12" subs generally require more box space)
**Power available (10" sub will sound 'better' off less power than a 12", however 200wrms will be OK for either size in the Octane R Range'
**type of music, 12"s play lower and louder so suit more 'popular' styles of music such as RnB, Rap, Pop etc etc. Techno, Dance and other electronic music may be more suited to a 10" driver. the only way to find out this though is to take one of yoru favorite albums along to a store and do a side by side comparison on the same model lineup between a 10" and a 12"
hope that helps
clarkstrrr
Jan 3 2004, 06:44 PM
i've had the sealed version of the pioneer, it was 12 inches tho. Distorted, didnt go loud, and couldnt handle and high frequencies. DONT BOTHER
DD Phil
Jan 3 2004, 06:47 PM
$100 is a tiny budget for a sub and enclosure, either of those is a bargain.
Don't expect huge results though, but you'd be happy for $100!
Phil
poeee
Jan 3 2004, 06:58 PM
I agree with NUMB. $100 is gunna get ya nowhere! Check out
www.webaudiodirect.com for the PG Octane R 12" (free postage also!).
What sort of amp will you be running the sub off? Do you own one or do you have to buy it?
smt_007
Jan 3 2004, 09:41 PM
Whats your budget?, the best bang for buck sub would be the Phoenix Gold:
http://www.webaudiodirect.com/prod196.htmYou can spend $100 or $1000 dollars on a subwoofer, as long as your happy with it doesnt matter what you get, just remember you get what you pay for.
[ January 03, 2004, 07:46 PM: Message edited by: SMT_007 ]
Damon
Jan 4 2004, 12:25 AM
Pioneer and Sony don;t make good sounding woofers under $600?
What a load of rubbish!
I've reviewed literally hundreds of woofers over the years, and currently use a Pioneers TSW-2005C (sell price $160 at JB or wherever) and it sound very good indeed. I've also been impressed by Sony's Pentagram woofers too.
While you do get what you pay for, I've found that woofer represent the most notable area in car audio where too much money is wasted and that there's is little benefit for spending innordinate amounts of money for regular listening.
Suprathai
Jan 4 2004, 12:44 AM
Thanks for all the replies.
I knew i forgot something in the orginal post. Well since everyone saying that about $100 is not really worth it. I guess i'll expand it till about $200 max.
I'm a uni student and income is pretty damn poor at the moment. So i'm not after earth shattering SPL, just something that will be adequate for everyday listening. I've did lots of reading on car audio since high school (about 5 years ago), and never put anything into a car before. So its all kinda new to me i guess in a way.
At the moment the system is stock. What i plan to do is put splits up front (running off the HU), HU (off my bro, its a pioneer cost him about $500 about 3 years ago), an amp and sub ($400), and also sound deadening(about $150) the doors up front. The HU first then amp and sub, followed by splits. So i'm really after best bang for my bucks component.
Thanks all
P.S. Limited budget, about $1000. Installing it by myself.
Anonymous
Jan 4 2004, 01:00 AM
QUOTE
Originally posted by Damon:
Pioneer and Sony don;t make good sounding woofers under $600?
What a load of rubbish!
While you do get what you pay for, I've found that woofer represent the most notable area in car audio where too much money is wasted and that there's is little benefit for spending innordinate amounts of money for regular listening.
What a load of rubbish!
well in that case lets all rush out, sell our 9515s, brahmas, inhumans etc and all buy sony!!!
I like ot be able to feed my woofers 1500wrms+ daily driving and still keep it at a very very high sq. sure, i have to spend money to be able to achieve this, and do so happily as im sure as hell your $160.00 sony's wont do this.
Sony and pioneer IMO do not make a worthy subwoofer under $600.00, woofers are very competitive and nobody in their right mind would choose sony and pioneer in the lower end above another manufactuers. so sorry, i should let you know, i consider worthy as the same as competitive.
clarkstrrr
Jan 4 2004, 01:34 AM
Have you head the lower end sony/pioneer's, they dont play music they go BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM rather quietly as well.
Its better money spent on splits or SD.
Suprathai
Jan 4 2004, 01:44 AM
Woah!!, Chill people plz...
That was the whole point of asking this, i guess the only way i'll know is if i listen to it myself really. But i just need some pointers from the crowd. I know that other brands produce much better subs, but budget is tight. So do you think it would be more wise to invest in better splits and SD and drop the sub??. Cause i think the sub would make a bigger difference then say slightly better splits. Plz correct me if i'm wrong.
Thanks All
I think i'm going to get the PG Octane R 12"
[ January 03, 2004, 11:48 PM: Message edited by: Suprathai ]
clarkstrrr
Jan 4 2004, 02:00 AM
Good choice
Javed
Jan 4 2004, 02:08 AM
How much power you got on tap for the sub?
Anonymous
Jan 4 2004, 02:11 AM
a sub is the most rewarding upgrade a person with a reasonable system can make
Balance is the key, if you have a balanced system (which will happen with nice splits, sound deadening, nice hu's and nicely powerful amps, nice subs etc) you will be very happy for a long time to come
Macca
Jan 4 2004, 02:24 AM
[quote]Originally posted by NUMB:
[QB][QUOTE]What a load of rubbish!
well in that case lets all rush out, sell our 9515s, brahmas, inhumans etc and all buy sony!!!
I like ot be able to feed my woofers 1500wrms+ daily driving and still keep it at a very very high sq. [QB][/quote]Well Damon does know his thing when it comes to car audio after all, he has been in the industry for a long time.
But NUMB as you noticed that the original post was of a $100 sub, now if he is only willing to spend around that price on a sub there no point going on about much more expencive gear.
A cheep sub in a well built enclosure can be just as good as a higher end sub where your not needed to take it to its limits.
[quote] While you do get what you pay for, I've found that woofer represent the most notable area in car audio where too much money is wasted and that there's is little benefit for spending innordinate amounts of money for regular listening [/quote]This is totally true... Spend more on your front stage remember a sub plays a bandwith of say 40Hz where as the fronts play the rest, front stage also provides detail for the sub... is it more obvious where the money should be spent
Magnat
Jan 4 2004, 02:57 AM
People Remember we are comparing Lower End Subwoofers. He asked Which Would be Better not What Would be Better !
Damon, I have to Agree, Pioneer Subs in the cheap end Do sound Great as long as you are not a Bass Head or an Audiophile.
Out of the Two Options the Pioneer 10 inch is the Better Buy. You may get More Cone Space with the 12 inch SONY but they dont reproduce the Quality as good as a 10 inch Sealed Pioneer.
Most People I have Cruised with have Used the Pioneer 10 inch's in Sealed enclosures and they have performed very well when compared to other lower End Subs like Kenwood and JVC.
I used a Pioneer 10 inch Diamond Plate Sub in a BandPass enclosure and loved it.
Anonymous
Jan 4 2004, 03:02 AM
macca: I was simply pointing out that a $170.00 PG Octane R would provide a much much better foundation than a sony sub
MattyP
Jan 4 2004, 03:32 AM
I personally think the 10" will be better for you in this case. Numb mentioned balance*, and since you plan to run the splits off the HU then 10" is the way to go. If balance isn't a factor, and you'd like a bit more lower & louder bass then go the 12".
There is nothing wrong with those Sony subs or Pioneer subs what so ever. I have heard those Pioneer subs sounding bad, but the reason behind it was not because its a **** sub, but coz it was sitting in one of those prefab boxes which will not be tuned to your car or music taste. Get / make a good tuned box, and it will sound fantastic..guarnteed.
Most of the replys here are like comparing their modified Subaru WRX to someone else's stock Hyundai Accent. Not everyone here can afford $1k sub woofers, $2k headunits & amplifiers etc. Sure a $1k system will not sound as good as one that is $5k, but its a system at least. We're not hear to brag about how awesome Brahim subs are compared to $200 Sony / Pioneer subs.
Seriously, who really pumps 1500WRMS+ daily into their subs (no offence bro). 1. You'd be so deaf 2. Would never have a front stage that would come close to keeping up / *BALANCING the sound out at that level.
Suprathai, if you had a system made of $250 sub box package, $300hu, $200 splits, $300 2 or 4ch amp IT WILL SOUND WAY BETTER than your factory system and you WON'T BE DISAPPOINTED. IT WILL MEET YOUR NEEDS, but would it meet others who say Sony and Pioneer are **** ...probably not (if it did they wouldn't say anyway and probably bag it still) but who gives a rats about them.
I can appreciate people who are giving the car audio game a go, whether or not they have a big bank account to spend on equipment. I myself have gone through 'cheap systems', and when done right they can be fantastic. The last one I had was a Panasonic HU (wasn't a cheap model though, but I had gone through 5 of them at least ranging from $300 up to $500 [cost prices though]), Phillips 4" splits and 6" Panasonic rear fill. Did it sound good? Sure bloody did, and if that was the only system I could possibly do atm I would do it again.
[ January 04, 2004, 01:55 AM: Message edited by: mattyeos ]
Suprathai
Jan 4 2004, 01:19 PM
I appreciate everyone for there input on this Topic. I've heard really expensive systems before, but really don't think my requirements are that high at the moment. A 1K system will sound much better then the current stock system no matter what.
I don't think the prefab enclosures are going to be that good unless of course they came from the manufacturer really, if not i don't think stores like strathfield would really care about how well the enclosure suits the subs.
Thanks all as i've been enlightned on this whole topic a bit more.
Cheers
P.S. Oh yeah i drive a 03 rolla
[ January 04, 2004, 11:24 AM: Message edited by: Suprathai ]
poeee
Jan 4 2004, 01:46 PM
I recon you should do this in stages. First buy a HU, Splits and an AMP. Then add the sub in the future, when the finances allow. $500 for the HU, $300 for the splits and $200 for the amp (second hand). I recomend getting your amp second hand and also look out for other componants second hand.
DD Phil
Jan 4 2004, 01:46 PM
Looking at your earlier post, you said you had a $1000 budget, and you were self installing. For $1000 you can build a REALLY nice sounding system that can show up many $5000 set-ups.
First, forget your $150 worth of sound-deadening, this money would be better spent on better speakers, you can add this at a later stage if you like.
I'd go:
CD $200 (Second hand one mentioned)
Fronts $330
Sub $170
Amp $300
You should be able to get some very good speakers within this budget; I'd go for Diamond Audio M3, Boston FS or Hertz.
For sub, look at PG and Dragster, or better still a used $350 sub, as an example we have a used Crossfire P1 selling for $120, I'm sure many other stores have similar bargains.
Amp: Axis or Avantguarde have 4x75W amps in this budget, the Axis even looks pretty flash. They aren't Bostons or Audisons but they do the job, we use heaps in cheaper systems, as they have proved reliable.
Definitely run a 4 channel amp, the cost difference from a 2 to 4 channel isn't much and you're already paying for power and RCA cables etc. The SQ improvement gained by high-passing and amping them is worth the money.
Phil
Sonic Nirvana
Jan 4 2004, 07:19 PM
Not a big fan of the $100 sub, usually leads to disappointment.
As above the Octane R is awesome value and will do the job nicely, whether 10" or 12" is of little concern, honestly. If you have space for the 12" and it'd bigger box, go that way IMO.
Will have more output and efficiency, balance by level controls on the amp or HU if you have that option.
Far and away the biggest thing with SQ bass is the enclosure and set-up. Build the box twice as strong and rigid as you think is necessary.
25mm mdf and brace it and you won't go wrong.
For system design, yes, as above others things should take priority but if you want to get a bit of bump going, by all means start with a sub and go from there.
The $170 sub option will give you something to build on and pick up a decent amp cheap in the second hand section here.
Hope that helps.
Damon
Jan 5 2004, 10:31 AM
Well NUMB, that was quite an interesting and well thought out response. It was also very endearing to hear that you like to, apparently, drive around with your amplifiers producing a constant 1500WRMS or more at any given time. I find this quite hard to believe but anyway...
Looking at you product list on the bottom of your post, and reading your posts themselves, shows that you have a very healthy respect for 'prestigious brands'. Which, I suppose, is all well and good for you.
There are, however, other people in the universe who don't place of find such high value ins spending that much money on car audio. Nor does everyone, I might add, engage in listening to sub bass as the type of output level you claim to.
For these people the mainstay brands like Pioneer, Sony, Clarion, Kenwood, Panasonic et-al represent the value and performance they demand. The funny thing is that sales history has proven yearin and year out that these brands outsell prestigious brands by some margin. In fact, if you could obtain sales reports for car audio sales worldwide for the past, gee let me think, 10 years - you'd find that Pioneer and Sony have been the two largest car audio manufacturers in this time. If their gear sounded so bad, worked like rubbish, or was bad value then their marketing companies all deserve big fat raises...
Then again, the whole world could be gravely mistaken and brand snobs may be correct after all.
If so that's a pity. I find it sad that people truly believe that they need to spend extraordinary amounts of cash to get good results when I've made a reasonable career trying to help them do otherwise if they so want.
[ January 05, 2004, 08:33 AM: Message edited by: Damon ]
ultim8DTM5
Jan 5 2004, 11:09 AM
I agree with Damon's above post, purely because entry level and $100 subs are the bread and butter of the industry. We also have to start somewhere.
Suprathai- see if you can check out the Kicker EX as well, it should be around your budget if you bargain hard enough.
I'm a uni student as well, and I have a lot of expensive equipment going into my car (see sig.) It's because I work two jobs; one income for the car and another for life as well as uni fulltime. I've also only had rear fill for the last 12 months. Why? Because I skimp and save to afford what I will be able to enjoy. I'm going into my third year and have yet to fail anything. It's alright at the moment, I'm waiting on splits and a sub to be shipped from Germany so I'm saving money in the meantime
When I'm done my system would have cost the normal person over $7,000 in equipment alone. I'm lucky to pay half- be smart, buy used and bargain hard for new.
Just some friendly advice from someone in the same boat.
Suprathai
Jan 5 2004, 12:08 PM
Well it all comes down purely to interest really on this topic. I'm not a really big fanatic into car audio systems. I'm more the type that likes to modify the engine and looking for performance and handling in a car. But if its got to do with cars then generally i will be interested. I've thought of doing it in stages and spending quite a bit as well, but i can't justify myself into spending that much money really.
The opportunity came for me when my brother said he was changing his head unit, so i'm planning to grab his old one. Its not that bad his old one, 4x45W mosfet pioneer powered head unit. So i'll be using that for the meantime, and the $1000 is going to be for the amp, sub and very nice splits.
If then i'm not happy with the HeadUnit, i'll get a new one later on down the track.
Cheers
~Sparkles~
Jan 5 2004, 03:01 PM
I think a few of us are missing the point basically what he is saying is that he wants to upgrade from his ghetto blaster stock system to something around the quality of a fair mini/midi system as for subs under $100 sounding sh!t well i can say that the $40 10" sansui sub in my sisters car made a huge difference, sure i couldnt deal with it in my car but then again i like to listen to my music a little louder and im more into SQ, all she wanted was to take the bass from her 6" speakers and stop headunit clipping trying to make bass so i got her a 2nd hand 4 channel 2 channels hi pass near no gains for the 6" 2 bridged low passed @ 160 htz slightly more gains and a mate donated the sansui sub which he had from a car he brought the sub/amp including wiring cost less than $150 and sounds mad compared to the little pissant system that used to distort ne thing over 15 on the volume now u can wind it upto 25 no distortion and it still has enough power to rattle her parcel shelf. so it wont win ne SQ prizes and certainly wont win ne SPL contests. but it a heap better than what she had and with the 4 channel is a basis which she can upgrade from (which she has she upgraded to a set of cheap splits from the coax up front and made a huge difference to imaging)
Bassaholic
Jan 5 2004, 09:24 PM
QUOTE
Originally posted by NUMB:
What a load of rubbish!
well in that case lets all rush out, sell our 9515s, brahmas, inhumans etc and all buy sony!!!
You REALLY don't get it do you?????
----------
Anyway, Incarphil has some good advice - careful spending on quality reliable second hand gear, paying particular attention to select good sounding front speakers as well as installing it yourself, will result in an excellent system with minimal money spent.
Damon
Jan 6 2004, 12:50 AM
"I think a few of us are missing the point basically what he is saying is that he wants to upgrade from his ghetto blaster stock system to something around the quality of a fair mini/midi system as for subs under $100 sounding sh!t well i can say that the $40 10" sansui sub in my sisters car made a huge difference, sure i couldnt deal with it in my car but then again i like to listen to my music a little louder and im more into SQ, all she wanted was to take the bass from her 6" speakers and stop headunit clipping trying to make bass so i got her a 2nd hand 4 channel 2 channels hi pass near no gains for the 6" 2 bridged low passed @ 160 htz slightly more gains and a mate donated the sansui sub which he had from a car he brought the sub/amp including wiring cost less than $150 and sounds mad compared to the little pissant system that used to distort ne thing over 15 on the volume now u can wind it upto 25 no distortion and it still has enough power to rattle her parcel shelf." - Komodowagon
That kills me! Komodowagon just set the world record for the longest internet forum post sentence in hisory! I almost passed out from lack of oxygen while trying to read it out loud!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.