QUOTE (muzzy66 @ Jun 9 2008, 11:36 PM)

I don't want to think about the number of big reliability problems I've had in the past using generic brands of ram - given how small the price difference tends to be (between a good brand and generic) I just couldn't justify risking reliability (and performance, to a lesser degree) to save $20 or $30.
I can understand your reservations about cheaper ram Muzzy

However in my years of desktop support I can count on two fingers how many PC's I've had fail from bad memory.
From my experience memory failure is a rare thing.
I absolutely agree with you on buying good quality ram if you are planning to overclock or modify your PC .... but if you are just going to be running at stock speeds I think you could spend the extra money elsewhere (a faster processor etc)
Depending on what you are after the price difference could be more than just $20 to $30 dollars.
As an example When I bought my ram .... 2Gb of generic (kingston/Samsung/Apacer) was $56, where as 2Gb of high speed OCZ ram was $119 .... so my 4Gb of OCZ cost me $238 over twice the amount of the generic stuff.
And then to rub salt into the wound .... 2 weeks after I bought my memory it had a massive price drop .... it's currently selling at $69 for 2Gb ....
Again it depends on what your needs are and the differences in price at any given time .... if it's cost effective to go for the good quality fast ram then for sure go for it .... if it's not cost effective at the time and if your needs are for a normal standard PC .... then don't be scared to save some money using the generic stuff.
Ah well .... such is life with PC hardware
QUOTE (muzzy66 @ Jun 9 2008, 11:36 PM)

Onto the other issue of quality vs quantity, this depends on your application. From the benchmarks I've seen in my time, it seems as if very few applications show any noticable benifit when jumping from 2GB of ram up to 4GB.
Games in particular (from all tests and benchmarks) seem to show absolutely zero benefit. It seems like only the select few applications (main media encoding, etc) can really benefit from the extra.
Vista does like it's ram and 2Gb would be the minimum I would run on it. I went for 4Gb so that I can have a number of applications open at once as well as run a virtual machine without having the PC slow down to much.
For me the extra ram is for a smoother running environement with all the bells and whistles turned on and nothing to do with any increase in benchmarking speed.
QUOTE (muzzy66 @ Jun 9 2008, 11:36 PM)

So, I just went with 2GB of nice Geil 800mhz ram, with 4-4-4-12 timing and some sexy metallic orange heatspreaders!
Just like my sexy chrome heat spreaders