Music Pirate
Apr 23 2008, 09:05 PM
Hey guys,
I am curious to know how everyone has their system setup in regards to frequencies (cut offs etc) as you see most members stating their frequency range's for most of their components (tweeters comes to mind) in various threads.
I was thinking for structure, maybe something along the lines of stating your system components and the frequency range you have 'allocated' for that part of the system, as well as why you have it at that certain range (maybe due to driver limitations etc)
I would get the ball rolling but I haven't got a system installed
Cheers,
Jas.
~Spyne~
Apr 23 2008, 09:12 PM
see sig
boston: up to 50-something hz
oz's: 63hz - 2.5khz
morel's: 3.2khz+
why? because it sounds good like this
zion187reigneth
Apr 23 2008, 09:26 PM
i have set my 3 ways up 2 different ways
having the tweeter just around or above the upper voice freq 5khz and up
midrange 800hz to 5khz, for trying to get all the vocals comming from those drivers.
midbass-upto 800hz
the other way is to run it like a 2 way
tweet- playing as low as it possibly can 2khz
midrange- just being used to play a small amount the freq range 1000hz-2000hz
midbass-upto 1000hz
Pulse-R
Apr 23 2008, 09:45 PM
Currently:
Focal 33KX LP 56Hz/18dB
Dyn MW160 HP 71/18dB LP 560Hz/18dB
Dyn MD140/2 HP 710/18dB LP 3k2/12dB
Morel MT23 HP 4k5/18dB
This will change considerably by next round
~thematt~
Apr 23 2008, 10:06 PM
This is changing this weekend because of my new tweeters (yeah!) but....
Dyn MD130 5Khz 24/oct
Dyn MD140 300Hz 36/oct 5kHz 24/oct
Dyn MW160 80Hz 24/oct 300Hz 24/oct
JBL 2268HPL 100Hz 36/oct
Cyberpunky
Apr 24 2008, 03:41 AM
subs LP @ 50Hz ish @24dB/octave
the rest HP @ 65Hz ish @24dB/octave and let dynaudio worry about the rest..yes I use passivses
can't be more specific as never scoped it, to see whats going on
peace
cyberpunky
subs LP @ 50Hz ish @24dB/octave
the rest HP @ 65Hz ish @24dB/octave and let dynaudio worry about the rest..yes I use passivses
can't be more specific as never scoped it, to see whats going on
peace
cyberpunky
Charger
Apr 24 2008, 08:05 AM
Woofers - 20 - 63Hz @ 18dB
Mids - 63 - 2500Hz @ 18dB
Tweets - 2500 - infinity @ 18dB
BMWTurbo
Apr 24 2008, 09:14 AM
Woofers :- 63Hz 24dB Low Pass
Mids :- 63Hz 24dB High Pass <-> 3150Hz 12dB Low Pass
Tweeters :- 3150Hz 12dB High Pass
I might try back down around 1250Hz mid-tweet when I get my system running again.
Luke352
Apr 24 2008, 12:29 PM
Sub 63Hz 24db Low Pass (active)
Midbass 63Hz 12db High Pass - 200hz 6db Low Pass (active)
Mid 500hz 6db High Pass - 5500hz 12db Low Pass (passive)
Tweeter 6000hz 6db High Pass (passive)
You may think I have a massive hole in my lower midrange with one cross point being 200hz and then the mid picking up at 500hz but my reasoning for this is that the DLS UR6 drivers have an incredibly strong and bright lower midrange and theres a huge peak around that area, so rather then waste eq bands trying to EQ it out I've chosen a more shallow slope using it to help eq out the peak. It seems to work quite well and give decent performance and I'm still using some eq to bring that area down so it gives you an idea of the size of response rise I'm trying to control.
Matt VIP
Apr 24 2008, 12:45 PM
not going to answer this just yet as it all just got installed and I'm still mucking around...but this is a great thread, especially with people indicating why they use a certain setup, and whether or not it works well.
otherwise, we just get a 63>2.5k, or 63>300>5k at 12 or 24db slope type answer.
Damo95
Apr 24 2008, 02:47 PM
i have my crossovers set up 2 different ways..
Street (general cruising):
sub - 80Hz LP
midbass - 80Hz HP / 250Hz LP (bandpass)
mid/tweet - 250Hz HP (then midrange/tweeter x-over thru focal passive)
SQ mode (in comps):
sub - 63Hz lp
midbass - 63Hz hp / 315Hz lp (bandpass)
mid/tweet - 315Hz hp (then midrange/tweeter x-over thru focal passive)
Matt VIP
Apr 24 2008, 02:50 PM
why the changes Damo?
~thematt~
Apr 25 2008, 10:04 AM
Looks to me like he enjoys some volume...!!
dsheps83
Apr 25 2008, 10:18 AM
i dont have much of a system just a sub and a 2 way component but
sub 63hz / 18db or 12db cant remember
component 80hz /12db
but anyway would i be missing some tones with a gap like that even though my slope is only 12db not 18db or 24db?
bluboy
Apr 25 2008, 11:27 AM
For dance and more upbeat music
Sub- 100hz@24db
Mids- hp100hz@18-24db and Lp 3.2khz@24db
Tweets- 4khz@18db
And for rock and more classic music
Sub- 80hz@24db
Mids- hp80hz@18db and Lp 2.5khz@24db
Tweets- 3.2khz@24db
this is constantly changing i dont think it will ever stop!
~thematt~
Apr 25 2008, 11:42 AM
QUOTE (dsheps83 @ Apr 25 2008, 08:18 AM)

i dont have much of a system just a sub and a 2 way component but
sub 63hz / 18db or 12db cant remember
component 80hz /12db
but anyway would i be missing some tones with a gap like that even though my slope is only 12db not 18db or 24db?
Most cars tend to have a boost around 80Hz naturally. By leaving a gap, I think you'll find that the system is more linear.
Fudd
Apr 25 2008, 12:18 PM
no sub at the moment
mids from about 'yay'
and tweeters about 'yay'
sounds good too
SStealth
Apr 26 2008, 10:11 AM
^ very interesting fudd. I like your choices.
anywho...
Rainbow Profi 10" Sub @ 71Hz 30db\
Sinfoni 6.5" Mids @ 71Hz 24db\ and 2k5Hz 24db\
Sinfoni 1" Tweet @ 2k5Hz 24db\
Sounds great for this car, tweets are low as they are a-pillar mounted and bring the stage up above the dash nicely. This is what I ran at nationals last year and the judges seem to like it too, came equal second, 1 point off first in AMST.
And for daily turn the sub up maybe +2 or +4 depending on the cd.
Ant
mad89
Apr 26 2008, 10:19 AM
Boston G512: LP 63hz @ 24db
Alpine Type X MB: HP 63hz @ 24db - LP 315hz @ 18db
Alpine 4": HP 315hz @ 18db - LP ~2.5khz @ 12db
Total Recoil 1": HP ~2.7khz @ 12db
TEGBOY
Apr 27 2008, 11:17 AM
Mine is:
CD2MH 1000hz up
X65 80hz to 1000hz
12's" 80hz and down
All with 24db slopes. Because I have steep slopes I can get away with this, if I was only using 12db, I would need to run the horns from about 1.2->
Sounds dang good to me, as for comp use?? Dunno.
antisven
Apr 27 2008, 09:43 PM
tweeter/4k -18db slope
midrange/280-4k -18db slopes
midbass/50-315 -18db slopes
sub/50 down-18db slope
sounds good
Cyberpunky
May 1 2008, 03:15 AM
my whole system is tuned for yay lol
golf_bht
May 1 2008, 04:51 AM
TW 4K/30
MID 4K/24
400/24
Low 400/24
50/24
Sub 50/30
It varied from car to car so those number doesn't mean anything to me. the quality of your install will tell which Hz you will cut your frq off and by how steep. as a rules of thumb, learn to read the spec sheet of your speakers. That will tell you much more than I could ever tell.
BMWTurbo
May 1 2008, 08:51 AM
A question to the gents running BIG slopes on the mid-tweet merge, where abouts are your mids lcoated?
I have been playing around with 24dB mid-tweet merges, but find it slightly lacking. I am crossing over at 1.6k though, so possibly it's due to the low freq I'm using.
BMWTurbo
May 2 2008, 08:56 AM
Following up on this. Last night I did some testing with differing slopes and frequencies and it seems that with 12-12 and 24-24 I was still getting a slight dip at the crossover frequency.
Am I correct in saying that a 12-12/slope with speakers wired electrically in phase I could rid the 'dip' by putting them eletrically out of phase? Or in turn I could have a 24-12 or vice versa slope to try and remove the dip without requiring EQ?
Damo95
May 2 2008, 01:38 PM
QUOTE (VIP318 @ Apr 24 2008, 02:50 PM)

why the changes Damo?
QUOTE (~thematt~ @ Apr 25 2008, 10:04 AM)

Looks to me like he enjoys some volume...!!
Thats partly the reason Matt.. but a good one... and yes, i do enjoy volume.. especially when you got 1400wrms at your disposal for front stage duties..
the main reason for the shift in crossovers is longetivity..
i run safer crossover settings for daily use... and more 'accurate' settings for comp.. the midbass rolls off ~300Hz.. and 315 is fine for comps, but not daily..
dont really wanna blow them so yeah.. and playing the midbass down lower also works with blending the midbass & sub better..

in future, the new setup will be left at the "street" setting..
zion187reigneth
May 2 2008, 11:46 PM
QUOTE (BMWTurbo @ May 2 2008, 08:56 AM)

Following up on this. Last night I did some testing with differing slopes and frequencies and it seems that with 12-12 and 24-24 I was still getting a slight dip at the crossover frequency.
Am I correct in saying that a 12-12/slope with speakers wired electrically in phase I could rid the 'dip' by putting them eletrically out of phase? Or in turn I could have a 24-12 or vice versa slope to try and remove the dip without requiring EQ?
At times i thought i had some good sounds running 24 db slopes on the Lp on drivers and using 12db slopes on the hp.
what are u using for your rta testing?i need to do some myself but havent got one .
kittan
May 3 2008, 12:24 AM
Subs @ ard 85hz for daily use
Midbass @ 85 - 1 Khz
Horns handle the rest @ 1Khz to 20khz
thinking of getting a pair of tweets to do the 17.5 upwards as horns are dippin at that point
Pulse-R
May 3 2008, 08:27 AM
heheehehe
Sub 63Hz 24dB
midbass 63Hz 24dB / 630Hz 6dB
midrange 1kHz 6dB / 8kHz 6dB
tweeter 4.5 kHz 12dB
might change again *Shrugs*
muzzy66
May 11 2008, 01:07 AM
I don't run a system right now, but my previous one was as follows:
Scanspeak D3004-6600 AirCirc: > 2.5khz @ 18dB/oct
Scanspeak 7" Revelator: 160hz @ 18dB/oct - 2.5khz @ 18dB/oct
Peerless 12" XXLS: < 160hz @ 18dB/oct
BMWTurbo
May 13 2008, 09:01 AM
QUOTE (zion187reigneth @ May 2 2008, 11:16 PM)

At times i thought i had some good sounds running 24 db slopes on the Lp on drivers and using 12db slopes on the hp.
what are u using for your rta testing?i need to do some myself but havent got one .
I was using Eclipse E-iserv for my 'RTA' (term used loosely), it was the best I had access to. I'd do approx. 3-4 test of each set-up and then jump on the web and let it do it's thing and compare the results, more often then not, they were exactly the same.
Should have an ECM8000 and UB802 on it's way to me soon so I can get some 'real' results however
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.