QUOTE (Aurora82au @ Nov 12 2006, 10:43 AM)

How much are the Rainbow Platniums? I tried to find prices on Rainbow stuff a while ago but couldnt find it. Ive always been interested in Rainbow stuff.
There are two varients of the Platinum line - active (without crossovers) and passice (with crossovers). Give a call to any of the authorised Rainbow dealers, and they should be happy to tell you the RRP of both sets.
I'd prefer not to quote prices, as I haven't seen a set-in-stone price in several months, and they may easilly have changed since then.

QUOTE (n_16er @ Nov 14 2006, 01:49 AM)

how are hertz of focal wank factor, Hertz is a very under rated brand,
both have just won European design awards
I've actually heard a couple of Hertz sets, namely the Mille's and HSK165's.
The HSK's are quite good for the money, and imo one of the better sets at that price point.
The Milles are nice, but didn't blow me away the way $2,000 worth of speakers should. In fact, Dynaudio and Rainbow both have left a much stronger impression on me, and both did it for half the price.
I wouldn't say that hertz have no wank factor. Their Mille line are probably one of the most styled sets of high end speakers / subs i've ever seen. Cone shaped cones, chrome lined Ribbon mids, chrome covered tweeter grills, shiny magnets - hardly 'typical' in appearance. That's not to say they don't perform though.
QUOTE (Vanilla Ice @ Nov 15 2006, 03:29 AM)

i have owned hertz dude, i know what they look like.
the OZ dont even have a sticker with there name on them, plain black baskets with plain black cones. nothing extra spent on them.
dyn come close, the rest all come with fancy grills and crap.
not saying there not good speakers, but i rather see the money im spending on speakers (that is something that produces sound) to sound better than they look.
My old Rainbow Profi's were much the same in that respect. Black basket, black cone. The only thing that stood out was the aluminium Phase Plug (which is optional anyway).
The Vanadium / Power / Platinum ranges look a little more shiny, but that's because they have metal cones, and metal tends to be shiny.
The Reference line is imo the sexiest speaker set on the market period, however given how much they cost I'm sure flashing them up a little didn't take too big a bite out of their R&D budget

QUOTE (Phat Devil @ Nov 16 2006, 03:31 AM)

lol, i wonder where my IDMax fits into the scheme of things. Its got chrome, speckled paint basket, huge triple stacked magnet, and cool looking sticker on the cone.

An IDMAX is defiantely not what I'd consider a wanky sub.
In fact, thats what I loved so much about mine. Mounted cone out, it has to be one of the most conservative looking subs around. No fat-ass surround (they use surround-height instead of thickness to maximise cone area), no pretty colours (Grey black dust cap on grey cone), and only a very, very basic company logo in the middle. From the back, the basket looks strong thick. Magnet is sexy because of it's triple-stacked thickness. Most of the visual aspects of the IDMAX are a result of functionality much like DD, Oz Audio, Treo, Crosfire, JL Audio (most models) etc.
Some other high subs such as Alpine Type X, Diamond TDX, Hertz Mille, Vibe Space etc do seem to put a little more thought into prettying them up a little, but this doesn't necesarilly mean they sound bad. These subs all have a very good reputation.
I wouldn't consider DLS boring looking either, with the glossed paper / yellow / silver and black cones, chrome magnets, gold terminals and screws, colorful crossovers PCB's and basketball-style grills. Clearly designed for function over form, but to me they dont have quite the visual simplicity of say Oz, Dyn or Morel.
Focal are a little bling heavy, however they also have a great reputation for sound so not sure if the whole looks vs performance thing is all that much to go by?