QUOTE (1973 ZF Fairlane @ Nov 15 2006, 01:41 AM)

i was in audioart in perth and i was told that if i bought a monoblock to run my two 12inch type R speakers not only will i get more wrms but the amp will run on less power. the down side is that the amp will be less reliable. how unreliable is the mono block and is a monoblock better that a multi output amp
Not necessarilly.
What he told you was seemingly a half arsed version of it.
A Class-D monoblock will run on less power then a Class A/B multi-channel amp, because a class-D architecture is as a rule more efficient.
That said, not all monoblocks are Class D, and not all multi-channel amps are Class-AB
For example, Audison's entry level SRx1 is a Class A/B monoblock, while Alpine's Alpine's PDX amplifiers are Class-D / T multi channel amps.
Likewise, a monoblock won't necesarilly always run your subs better, because there are some very gutrsy multi-channel amps out there that are designed with running subs in mind - however most of these are probably in the higher ends of the market.
Edit: Ok, few people beat me to it - I'll have to learn to read whole threads BEFORE posting

P.s. I don't belive people are trying to argue that Class-D amps provide more control, just that monoblocks do. Again, monoblocks don't have to be Class-D. That said, my current amp is a two channel amp, and is Class-T (a heavilly modified variation of Class-D) which seems to put it theoretically on the dirty end of both arguments. However it's run every sub i've put on it extremely well, and gave tons more control then my old SRx2S (a Class-AB stereo amp).
Perhaps, there should be less attention placed on the TYPE of amp, and more placed on the QUALITY of the amp? At the end of the day, who cares what the tech specs say - it's what it sounds like to your ears that counts.