Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: is a monoblock better?
Mobile Electronics Australia > Mobile Electronics Discussion > Sound Quality Discussion
davesmith
i was in audioart in perth and i was told that if i bought a monoblock to run my two 12inch type R speakers not only will i get more wrms but the amp will run on less power. the down side is that the amp will be less reliable. how unreliable is the mono block and is a monoblock better that a multi output amp
trism
monoblocks are better than mulit channel amps an runnig subs, becuase they have a gruntier power supply, and can feed more power, and control the sub better..
Stooge007
some argue that the sound isn't as good as using a class a/b, but i've never really been able to tell much of a difference.

- Stooge007 out
20Hurtz
Generally Monoblocks are designed to run subs whereas multichannel amps are designed to run speakers.

Depending on the amp they may get more wrms, depending on the amp design it will run more efficiently, ie consume less power. A monoblock is in no way inferior to a multichannle amp reliability wise.

Yes a monoblock is better.

haha how many people wanna beat me to it tongue.gif
SlimLim
efficiency is the main advantage over a class a/b. Less current draw for the output.
Fudd
QUOTE (20Hurtz @ Nov 15 2006, 01:11 PM) *
Monoblocks are designed to run subs whereas multichannel amps are designed to run speakers.

Depending on the amp they may get more wrms, depending on the amp design it will run more efficiently, ie consume less power. A monoblock is in no way inferior to a multichannle amp reliability wise.

Yes a monoblock is better.

haha how many people wanna beat me to it tongue.gif



not true..

my sub amp was designed for running sub's or full range speakers.
so was my last amp.
look at the DLS and Genesis amps, 2 channel amps designed to run subs.

i prefer a/b amps myself, i run oldskool SS 2 channel bridged. 500wrms and make my sub move.
20Hurtz
true but was trying not to complicate things. Post edited smile.gif
trism
read my amp tute in theFAQ section, it will tell you why a monoblock is better for subs...
SlimLim
stop changing all ur names goddammit! espically u fudd tongue.gif
Fudd
i never change my name, someone else does!

anyway ill keep using 2 channel amps till more companys bring out more a/b mono's biggrin.gif
Selfdestruktor
QUOTE (Vanilla Ice @ Nov 15 2006, 03:28 PM) *
i never change my name, someone else does!

anyway ill keep using 2 channel amps till more companys bring out more a/b mono's biggrin.gif


Audiobahn has a couple.......... tongue.gif tongue.gif tongue.gif
Fudd
i should add "good a/b amps"
DD Phil
A lot of people will tell you that Class D amps have too much distortion.

A lot do, but this is not true of all D class amps.....

Phil
ultim8DTM5
QUOTE (DD Phil @ Nov 16 2006, 12:06 PM) *
A lot of people will tell you that Class D amps have too much distortion.

A lot do, but this is not true of all D class amps.....

Phil



Just as a lot of people will tell you that A/B's are not efficient.

That is not true of all A/B class amps...
Blackfox
I use an old school Crossfire 2 channel Class A/B amplifier which produces 600watt rms at 4ohms at 12volts,

Compaired it to the Jarcay 600watt monoblock and the sound from the crossfire surpassed it without even trying, The Crossfire bench tested at 750watt rms at 4ohms at 14.4 volts.
Without any distortion noticable.

Unless i want to do SPL DB drags, For sq as this is the sq section i'm going to stick to class a/b amplifiers
Powerband
Many months ago I think it was Fuddbutter said the best sub he'd heard was a G5 off a Boston GT-28 amp
Is the GT-28 an A/B class amp?
DD Phil
QUOTE (powerband @ Nov 16 2006, 10:53 PM) *
Many months ago I think it was Fuddbutter said the best sub he'd heard was a G5 off a Boston GT-28 amp
Is the GT-28 an A/B class amp?


Yes.

GT28s rock, they're one of my favorite amps.

You need four. One for left, one for right and two for the sub. smile.gif

Phil
Luke352
I understand the more efficient and the gruntier power supply, but does someone want to explain to me how a D class amp supposedly controls your sub better since I thought class A/B amps had higher slew rates and damp factors, or have I got confused.

Thanks

Luke
Fudd
QUOTE (powerband @ Nov 16 2006, 11:53 PM) *
Many months ago I think it was Fuddbutter said the best sub he'd heard was a G5 off a Boston GT-28 amp
Is the GT-28 an A/B class amp?



i dont think i said that.. but awesome sub and awesome amp!

3 of my fave setups have been Mr Bob's brahma and hammer/vrx combo
Critters L7 and JL combo
and my own SS rubi and OZ ME12 combo.

there have been a couple more but cant think off the top of my head at the moment
ultim8DTM5
Damping factor has to be the most overrated amplifier specification ever.
Luke352
^^^ I do believe that to a degree. Can someone explain what is meant to give a D class amp better control, as it seems to be a term getting thrown around alot lately and I always just thought it was the other way around but I may have thought wrong. LOL smile.gif

Thanks Guys

Luke
muzzy66
QUOTE (1973 ZF Fairlane @ Nov 15 2006, 01:41 AM) *
i was in audioart in perth and i was told that if i bought a monoblock to run my two 12inch type R speakers not only will i get more wrms but the amp will run on less power. the down side is that the amp will be less reliable. how unreliable is the mono block and is a monoblock better that a multi output amp


Not necessarilly.

What he told you was seemingly a half arsed version of it.

A Class-D monoblock will run on less power then a Class A/B multi-channel amp, because a class-D architecture is as a rule more efficient.

That said, not all monoblocks are Class D, and not all multi-channel amps are Class-AB

For example, Audison's entry level SRx1 is a Class A/B monoblock, while Alpine's Alpine's PDX amplifiers are Class-D / T multi channel amps.

Likewise, a monoblock won't necesarilly always run your subs better, because there are some very gutrsy multi-channel amps out there that are designed with running subs in mind - however most of these are probably in the higher ends of the market.

Edit: Ok, few people beat me to it - I'll have to learn to read whole threads BEFORE posting sad.gif

P.s. I don't belive people are trying to argue that Class-D amps provide more control, just that monoblocks do. Again, monoblocks don't have to be Class-D. That said, my current amp is a two channel amp, and is Class-T (a heavilly modified variation of Class-D) which seems to put it theoretically on the dirty end of both arguments. However it's run every sub i've put on it extremely well, and gave tons more control then my old SRx2S (a Class-AB stereo amp).

Perhaps, there should be less attention placed on the TYPE of amp, and more placed on the QUALITY of the amp? At the end of the day, who cares what the tech specs say - it's what it sounds like to your ears that counts.
Powerband
QUOTE (DD Phil @ Nov 17 2006, 07:55 AM) *
Yes. GT28s rock, they're one of my favorite amps.
Phil

Right on, the GT-42 rocks as well


QUOTE (Vanilla Ice @ Nov 17 2006, 12:17 PM) *
i dont think i said that.. but awesome sub and awesome amp!


I've spent all night looking for the post, I think it was this one so I got it a bit wrong
Funny how your memory works

QUOTE (fuddbutter @ Feb 28 2006, 11:00 PM) *
i have heard both and most will say the id but still one of the best subs i have heard was a kicker l7 12in in a slot port.
the thing hammered and was just so tight and punchy and very musical.
the next best i have heard was 2 boston pro 12.5lf's in a CAASQ competitors car last year.. soo sweet!


While I was looking for that thread I found the debate over A/B vs D class has been covered before
- very interesting reading

Well anyway I intend to get the GT-28 for versatility being a 2ch class A/B amp
ProClass
Mono VS Multi-Channel
The design of the power supply section determines what amp is best to run a specific speaker array.
You must look at the amplifers topology and how the "mono" is done. Many so called mono amps are stereo amps internally bridged. So, while it is a mono block amp with respect to the connections on the out side the internals are infact two channels internally bridged.
I prefer mono block amps for a couple of reasons.
1. improved dampening
2. better channel seperation
3. impedance rises, dampening etc effect the one channel only. EG a 4 channel amp with a single internal powersupply is driving saty a pair of splits on 2 channels and a sub bridged across the other 2 channels.
The impedance rise, dampening etc on any of the channels will effect the common power supply driving all channels. So during heavy bass notes the full range channels would be effected.
Cheers
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.